Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Apr;8(4):289-93.
doi: 10.1007/BF01963452.

Evaluation of a rapid latex agglutination test for detection of group B streptococci in vaginal specimens

Affiliations

Evaluation of a rapid latex agglutination test for detection of group B streptococci in vaginal specimens

L Lotz-Nolan et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Apr.

Abstract

A rapid latex agglutination test (Bactigen Group B Streptococcus Cervical Screen) for detection of group B streptococci in cervical-vaginal specimens was evaluated using two different slide systems, the traditional serologic slide and capillary action track (Trak) slide. Culture was used as reference method. A total of 344 cervical-vaginal specimens were tested. The group B streptococci carrier rate was found by culture to be 10.8%, 56.8% of these specimens being heavily colonized. The sensitivity and specificity of the latex agglutination test in heavily colonized specimens was 95.2% and 99.3% for the serologic and track slides respectively. The overall sensitivity, including lightly colonized specimens, was 62.2%. The positive predictive value was 92% for both slide systems, and the negative predictive value 95.4% and 95.6% for the serologic and track slides respectively. The latex agglutination test, used with either slide, provides a rapid and effective method for identification of specimens heavily colonized with group B streptococci. The track slide may provide a convenient alternative to serologic slides since it does not require rotation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):558-60 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1978 May;137(5):524-30 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 1987 Jan;110(1):31-6 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 1973 Apr;82(4):707-18 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Mar;25(3):573-4 - PubMed