Why religion is better conceived as a complex system than a norm-enforcing institution
- PMID: 24970422
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X13003038
Why religion is better conceived as a complex system than a norm-enforcing institution
Abstract
Although religions, as Smaldino demonstrates, provide informative examples of culturally evolved group-level traits, they are more accurately analyzed as complex adaptive systems than as norm-enforcing institutions. An adaptive systems approach to religion not only avoids various shortcomings of institutional approaches, but also offers additional explanatory advantages regarding the cultural evolution of group-level traits that emerge from religion.
Comment in
-
Group-level traits emerge.Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):281-95. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x13003531. Behav Brain Sci. 2014. PMID: 25101360
Comment on
-
The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits.Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):243-54. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001544. Behav Brain Sci. 2014. PMID: 24970399
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
