Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014:2014:482906.
doi: 10.1155/2014/482906. Epub 2014 May 29.

Surgical technique in distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of randomized trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Surgical technique in distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of randomized trials

Filip Cečka et al. Biomed Res Int. 2014.

Abstract

Despite recent improvements in surgical technique, the morbidity of distal pancreatectomy remains high, with pancreatic fistula being the most significant postoperative complication. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) dealing with surgical techniques in distal pancreatectomy was carried out to summarize up-to-date knowledge on this topic. The Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, and Pubmed were searched for relevant articles published from 1990 to December 2013. Ten RCTs were identified and included in the systematic review, with a total of 1286 patients being randomized (samples ranging from 41 to 450). The reviewers were in agreement for application of the eligibility criteria for study selection. It was not possible to carry out meta-analysis of these studies because of the heterogeneity of surgical techniques and approaches, such as varying methods of pancreas transection, reinforcement of the stump with seromuscular patch or pancreaticoenteric anastomosis, sealing with fibrin sealants and pancreatic stent placement. Management of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy is still a matter of debate. The results of this systematic review are possibly biased by methodological problems in some of the included studies. New well designed and carefully conducted RCTs must be performed to establish the optimal strategy for pancreatic remnant management after distal pancreatectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the literature search strategy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Archives of Surgery. 2003;138(12):1310–1314. - PubMed
    1. DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of Surgery. 2006;244(6):931–937. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, et al. Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2008;12(10):1691–1697. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathan H, Cameron JL, Goodwin CR, et al. Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy. Annals of Surgery. 2009;250(2):277–281. - PubMed
    1. Pratt W, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, Callery MP, Vollmer CM., Jr. Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2006;10(9):1264–1279. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources