Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014:2014:489536.
doi: 10.1155/2014/489536. Epub 2014 May 26.

Prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node mapping in Merkel cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node mapping in Merkel cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic studies

Ramin Sadeghi et al. Biomed Res Int. 2014.

Abstract

Aim: To assess through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature the prognostic implication of sentinel lymph node mapping in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

Materials and methods: PubMed and SCOPUS databases were searched by using "Merkel AND sentinel" as keywords. All studies with prognostic information regarding SLN mapping in cN0 MCC patients were included. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was used as effect size.

Results: SLN biopsy predicted better DFS and OS as compared to the nodal observation in cN0 MCC patients (pooled HR for DFS: 1.61 (95% CI: 1.05-2.46), P = 0.028; pooled HR for OS: 1.08 (95% CI: 0.55-2.10), P = 0.8). Pathologically negative SLN (SLN-) patients had better OS (pooled HR: 4.42 (95% CI: 1.82-10.7), P = 0.0009) and DFS (pooled HR: 2.58 (95% CI: 1.78-3.73)) as compared to SLN+ patients.

Conclusion: SLN mapping can provide strong prognostic information regarding OS and DFS in cN0 MCC patients. More importantly, SLN mapping can improve DFS and possibly OS in cN0 MCC patients as compared to nodal observation. As MCC is a rare tumor, large multicenter prospective studies are still needed to validate the survival benefit of SLN mapping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the hazard ratio (HR) of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for operative staging with SLN mapping versus nodal observation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the hazard ratio (HR) of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for pathological SLN status.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Funnel plots of meta-analyses of pathological SLN status for DFS and OS.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pink R, Ehrmann J, Molitor M, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma. A review. Biomedical Papers. 2012;156(3):213–217. - PubMed
    1. Prieto Muñoz I, Pardo Masferrer J, Olivera Vegas J, Medina Montalvo MS, Jover Díaz R, Pérez Casas AM. Merkel cell carcinoma from 2008 to 2012: reaching a new level of understanding. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2013;39(5):421–429. - PubMed
    1. Tarantola TI, Vallow LA, Halyard MY, et al. Prognostic factors in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 240 cases. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2013;68(3):425–432. - PubMed
    1. Smith VA, Camp ER, Lentsch EJ. Merkel cell carcinoma: identification of prognostic factors unique to tumors located in the head and neck based on analysis of SEER data. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(6):1283–1290. - PubMed
    1. Herbert HM, Sun MT, Selva D, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma of the eyelid: management and prognosis. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2014;132(2):197–204. - PubMed

Publication types