Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Jul;40(3):415-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.05.062. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

A comparison of two walking while talking paradigms in aging

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of two walking while talking paradigms in aging

Clara Li et al. Gait Posture. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Our study aimed to [1] compare dual-task costs in gait and cognitive performance during two dual-task paradigms: walking while reciting alternate letters of the alphabet (WWR) and walking while counting backward by sevens (WWC); [2] examine the relationship between the gait and cognitive interference tasks when performed concurrently.

Scope: Gait and cognitive performance were tested in 217 non-demented older adults (mean age 76 ± 8.8 years; 56.2% female) under single and dual-task conditions. Velocity (cm/s) was obtained using an instrumented walkway. Cognitive performance was assessed using accuracy ratio: [correct responses]/[total responses]. Linear mixed effects models revealed significant dual-task costs, with slower velocity (p < .01) and decreased accuracy ratio (p < .01) in WWR and WWC compared to their respective single task conditions. Greater dual-task costs in velocity (p < .01) were observed in WWC compared to WWR. Pearson correlations revealed significant and positive relationships between gait and cognitive performance in WWR and WWC (p < .01); increased accuracy ratio was associated with faster velocity.

Conclusions: Our findings suggested that dual-task costs in gait increase as the complexity of the cognitive task increases. Furthermore, the positive association between the gait and cognitive tasks suggest that dual-task performance was not influenced by task prioritization strategies in this sample.

Keywords: Attention; Dual-task; Elderly; Walking; Walking while talking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huang H-J, Mercer VS. Dual-Task Methodology: Applications in Studies of Cognitive and Motor Performance in Adults and Children. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2001;13(3):133–140. - PubMed
    1. Verghese J, Buschke H, Viola L, et al. Validity of divided attention tasks in predicting falls in older individuals: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Sep;50(9):1572–1576. - PubMed
    1. Verghese JHR, Lipton RB, Wang C. Mobility Stress Test Approach to Predicting Frailty, Disability, and Mortality In High Functioning Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(10):1901–1905. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheridan PL, Solomont J, Kowall N, Hausdorff JM. Influence of executive function on locomotor function: divided attention increases gait variability in Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Nov;51(11):1633–1637. - PubMed
    1. Camicioli R, Howieson D, Lehman S, Kaye J. Talking while walking: the effect of a dual task in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1997 Apr;48(4):955–958. - PubMed

Publication types