The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding
- PMID: 24973904
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.010
The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the discontinuation rate of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant due to irregular vaginal bleeding among women with immediate postpartum insertion is increased compared to delayed postpartum and interval placement.
Study design: This retrospective cohort study compared women who underwent immediate postpartum etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion (within 96 h of delivery) to delayed postpartum (6 to 12 weeks postpartum) and interval insertion between January 2008 and December 2010. Charts were reviewed for date and reason for removal. A chi-squared test was used to compare discontinuation due to bleeding between cohorts. Baseline characteristics predictive of implant removal were evaluated by simple logistic regression.
Results: There were 259 women in the immediate postpartum group, 49 in the delayed postpartum group and 106 in the interval group. Average age at insertion was 22.6 (±5.5) years. Overall, 19.3% of women in the immediate postpartum group requested removal due to irregular bleeding compared to 18.4% in the delayed postpartum group [odds ratio (OR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-2.33] and 20.8% in the interval group (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.52-1.60). There was no difference between groups in premature removal rates for any side effect. There were no sociodemographic or clinical characteristics predictive of removal in any group.
Conclusion: One-fifth of etonogestrel contraceptive implant users requested premature removal due to irregular bleeding. Immediate postpartum implant insertion does not lead to increased removal rates and may help reduce unintended pregnancy. Mechanisms to help women manage irregular bleeding due to the implant are needed.
Implications: Immediate postpartum insertion of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant does not lead to increased removal rates due to vaginal bleeding compared to delayed postpartum or interval insertion. Immediate postpartum implant insertion may increase uptake of long-acting reversible contraception and help reduce short interpregnancy intervals and unintended pregnancy.
Keywords: Etonogestrel; Implanon; Implant; Nexplanon; Postpartum contraception.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Immediate postpartum etonogestrel implant: a contraception option with long-term continuation.Contraception. 2014 Sep;90(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 14. Contraception. 2014. PMID: 24993485
-
Six- and twelve-month documented removal rates among women electing postpartum inpatient compared to delayed or interval contraceptive implant insertions after Medicaid payment reform.Contraception. 2017 Jan;95(1):71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 8. Contraception. 2017. PMID: 27400823
-
Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):55.e1-55.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.036. Epub 2017 Feb 28. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28257962
-
Tolerability and clinical safety of Implanon.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 Jun;13 Suppl 1:29-36. doi: 10.1080/13625180801960012. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008. PMID: 18330815 Review.
-
Etonogestrel implant (Implanon) for contraception.Drug Ther Bull. 2001 Aug;39(8):57-9. Drug Ther Bull. 2001. PMID: 11526801 Review.
Cited by
-
Innate Immunity and Biomaterials at the Nexus: Friends or Foes.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:342304. doi: 10.1155/2015/342304. Epub 2015 Jul 12. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26247017 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prenatal contraceptive counseling and method provision after childbirth.Open Access J Contracept. 2015 May 13;6:53-63. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S52925. eCollection 2015. Open Access J Contracept. 2015. PMID: 29386923 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of contraceptive implants at 12 months in women who intended to undergo immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion following high-risk pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 May;66(3):241-251. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22280. Epub 2023 Apr 14. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37062533 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 22;4(4):CD011913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011913.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 27;10:CD011913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011913.pub3. PMID: 28432791 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Beyond the Surface: Care Seeking Among Patients Initiating Contraceptive Implant in an Urban Federally Qualified Health Center Network.J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Jan;8(1):20-25. doi: 10.1177/2150131916666011. Epub 2016 Sep 19. J Prim Care Community Health. 2017. PMID: 27587354 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical