Differential effects of cholinergic drugs on discriminative cues and self-stimulation produced by electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area
- PMID: 2497481
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00439446
Differential effects of cholinergic drugs on discriminative cues and self-stimulation produced by electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area
Abstract
Cholinergic receptors have been shown to modulate a subset of discriminative cues produced by electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in rats. The present study identified the specific cholinergic receptor type modulating these electrical brain-stimulation (EBS) cues, and assessed whether these receptors also mediated the rewarding effects of VTA EBS. The EBS cues were enhanced by the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine and the muscarinic receptor agonists pilocarpine and RS-86, whereas the nicotinic receptor agonist nicotine had no effect. The enhancing effects of pilocarpine or RS-86 were attenuated by the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine. The EBS cues were not affected when scopolamine was injected alone, although high doses disrupted discriminated responses. Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) rates were depressed by physostigmine and pilocarpine and increased by nicotine and scopolamine. These results indicated a facilitatory influence of muscarinic receptors on the EBS cues, and an inhibitory role in VTA ICSS. Nicotinic receptor activation did not affect the EBS cues, but facilitated ICSS. These differential effects of cholinergic receptor activation point to a dissociation of the specific EBS cues measured in this study from the rewarding effects of VTA stimulation.
Similar articles
-
Differential effects of physostigmine on cues produced by electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area using two discrimination procedures.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1987 Oct;28(2):261-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90223-1. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1987. PMID: 3685060
-
Pharmacological characterization of the physostigmine stimulus in rats.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;95(4):553-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00172975. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988. PMID: 3145526
-
Effects of agonists and antagonists of cholinergic receptors on self-stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat.Gen Pharmacol. 1986;17(1):63-7. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(86)90012-1. Gen Pharmacol. 1986. PMID: 3949150
-
Discriminative stimulus effects of cholinergic agonists and the actions of their antagonists.Psychopharmacol Ser. 1988;4:32-43. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-73223-2_3. Psychopharmacol Ser. 1988. PMID: 3293044 Review.
-
M5 muscarinic receptors are needed for slow activation of dopamine neurons and for rewarding brain stimulation.Life Sci. 2001 Apr 27;68(22-23):2449-56. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(01)01038-4. Life Sci. 2001. PMID: 11392612 Review.
Cited by
-
On the Similarity Between the Reinforcing and the Discriminative Properties of Intracranial Self-Stimulation.Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb 21;16:799015. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.799015. eCollection 2022. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35264936 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of reinforcer magnitude on timing in rats.J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):201-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.38-06. J Exp Anal Behav. 2007. PMID: 17465312 Free PMC article.
-
Cholinergic regulation of mood: from basic and clinical studies to emerging therapeutics.Mol Psychiatry. 2019 May;24(5):694-709. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0219-x. Epub 2018 Aug 17. Mol Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 30120418 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs.Pharmacol Rev. 2014 Jul;66(3):869-917. doi: 10.1124/pr.112.007419. Pharmacol Rev. 2014. PMID: 24973197 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources