Use of a validated algorithm to judge the appropriateness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: a multicenter longitudinal cohort study
- PMID: 24974958
- PMCID: PMC4190177
- DOI: 10.1002/art.38685
Use of a validated algorithm to judge the appropriateness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: a multicenter longitudinal cohort study
Abstract
Objective: In previous studies conducted outside the US, ∼20% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgeries were judged to be inappropriate. The present study was undertaken to determine the prevalence rates of TKA surgeries classified as appropriate, inconclusive, and inappropriate in a knee osteoarthritis population in the US.
Methods: We used a modification of a validated appropriateness classification system and applied it to patients in the Osteoarthritis Initiative data set who underwent TKA. A variety of preoperative data were used in the classification, including Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and physical function scores, radiographic features, knee motion and laxity measures, and age.
Results: Data on 205 patients who underwent TKA were examined. The prevalence rates for classification of the procedure as appropriate, inconclusive, and inappropriate were 44.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 37-51%), 21.7% (95% CI 16-28%), and 34.3% (95% CI 27-41%), respectively.
Conclusion: Approximately one-third of TKA surgeries were judged to be inappropriate. Variation in the characteristics of patients undergoing TKA was extensive. These data support the need for consensus development of criteria for patient selection among US practitioners treating patients who are potential candidates for TKA. Among the important issues, consensus development needs to address variation in patient characteristics and the relative importance of preoperative status and subsequent outcome.
Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Rheumatology.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interest Statement: The authors had no competing interests that that could potentially and inappropriately influence (bias) their work and conclusions.
Figures
Comment in
-
Editorial: appropriateness of total knee arthroplasty.Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Aug;66(8):1979-81. doi: 10.1002/art.38688. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014. PMID: 24975039 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Improving the criteria for appropriateness of total joint replacement surgery: comment on the article by Riddle et Al.Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;67(2):585. doi: 10.1002/art.38926. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015. PMID: 25371025 No abstract available.
-
Reply: To PMID 24974958.Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;67(2):585-6. doi: 10.1002/art.38929. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015. PMID: 25371232 No abstract available.
References
-
- Ghomrawi HM, Schackman BR, Mushlin AI. Appropriateness criteria and elective procedures--total joint arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(26):2467–9. - PubMed
-
- Slover J, Zuckerman JD. Increasing use of total knee replacement and revision surgery. JAMA. 2012;308(12):1266–8. - PubMed
-
- Escobar A, Quintana JM, Arostegui I, Azkarate J, Guenaga JI, Arenaza JC, et al. Development of explicit criteria for total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(1):57–70. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
