Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;27(3):261-7.
doi: 10.15274/NRJ-2014-10051. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging: perception and expectations of neurologists, neurosurgeons and psychiatrists

Paulo Branco  1 , Margarida Ayres-Basto  2 , Pedro Portugal  3 , Isabel Ramos  4 , Daniela Seixas  5
Affiliations

Brain magnetic resonance imaging: perception and expectations of neurologists, neurosurgeons and psychiatrists

Paulo Branco et al. Neuroradiol J. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has rapidly become an essential diagnostic tool in modern medicine. Understanding the objectives, perception and expectations of the different medical specialties towards MRI is therefore important to improve the quality of the examinations. Our aim was to better comprehend the reasons and expectations of neurologists, neurosurgeons and psychiatrists when requesting brain MRI scans for their patients, and also to perceive the degree of confidence of these specialists in the images and respective reports. Sixty-three specialists were recruited from two tertiary hospitals and answered a tailored questionnaire. Neurosurgeons were more concerned with the images themselves; neurologists lacked confidence in both MRI images and reports, and one third of the psychiatrists only read the report and were the most confident of the specialties in MRI findings. These results possibly reflect the idiosyncrasies of each of these medical specialties. This knowledge, driven by efficient communication between neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons, neurologists and psychiatrists, may contribute to improve the quality of MRI examinations and consequently patient care and management of health resources.

Keywords: ethics; interdisciplinary communication; magnetic resonance imaging; neurology; neurosurgery; psychiatry; radiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Questionnaire. Tailored questionnaire applied to the sample of neurologists, neurosurgeons and psychiatrists (translated into English for comprehension).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Confidence in brain magnetic resonance images, protocols and examination reports. Graphic representations across specialties – Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry – illustrating confidence in brain magnetic resonance images, protocols and reports.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kettenbach J, Wong T, Kacher D, et al. Computer-based imaging and interventional MRI: applications for neurosurgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1999;23(5):245–258. doi: 10.1016/S0895-6111(99)00022-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCarron M, Sands C, McCarron P. Quality assurance of neuroradiology in a District General Hospital. Q J Med. 2006;99(3):171–175. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcl012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Linden DE, Fallgatter AJ. Neuroimaging in psychiatry: from bench to bedside. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009;3:49. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.049.2009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallis A, McCoubrie P. The radiology report – Are we getting the message across? Clin Radiol. 2011;66(11):1015–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dalla Palma D, Stacul F, Meduri S, et al. Relationships between radiologists and clinicians: results from three surveys. Clin Radiol. 2000;55(8):602–605. doi: 10.1053/crad.2000.0495. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources