Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;22(2):59-74.
doi: 10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000041.

The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for different stages of non-specific low back pain: an update of systematic reviews

Affiliations

The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for different stages of non-specific low back pain: an update of systematic reviews

Benjamin Hidalgo et al. J Man Manip Ther. 2014 May.

Abstract

Objective: to review and update the evidence for different forms of manual therapy (MT) for patients with different stages of non-specific low back pain (LBP).

Data sources: MEDLINE, Cochrane-Register-of-Controlled-Trials, PEDro, EMBASE.

Method: A systematic review of MT with a literature search covering the period of January 2000 to April 2013 was conducted by two independent reviewers according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. A total of 360 studies were evaluated using qualitative criteria. Two stages of LBP were categorized; combined acute-subacute and chronic. Further sub-classification was made according to MT intervention: MT1 (manipulation); MT2 (mobilization and soft-tissue-techniques); and MT3 (MT1 combined with MT2). In each sub-category, MT could be combined or not with exercise or usual medical care (UMC). Consequently, quantitative evaluation criteria were applied to 56 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and hence 23 low-risk of bias RCTs were identified for review. Only studies providing new updated information (11/23 RCTs) are presented here.

Results: Acute-subacute LBP: STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 when compared to sham for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term (1-3 months). MODERATE-evidence to support MT1 and MT3 combined with UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term. Chronic LBP: MODERATE to STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 in comparison to sham for pain, function and overall-health in the short-term. MODERATE-evidence in favour of MT3 combined with exercise or UMC in comparison to exercise and back-school was established for pain, function and quality-of-life in the short and long-term. LIMITED-evidence in favour of MT2 combined with exercise and UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain and function from short to long-term. LIMITED-evidence of no effect for MT1 with extension-exercise compared to extension-exercise alone for pain in the short to long-term.

Conclusion: This systematic review updates the evidence for MT with exercise or UMC for different stages of LBP and provides recommendations for future studies.

Keywords: Efficacy; Manual therapy; Non-specific low back pain; Randomized controlled trials; Spinal manipulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of inclusion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Waddell G. The back pain revolution. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
    1. Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012;379:482–91. - PubMed
    1. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000;84:95–103. - PubMed
    1. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008;8:8–20. - PubMed
    1. Delitto A, George SZ, Van Dillen LR, Whitman JM, Sowa G, Shekelle P, et al. Low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:A1–57. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources