Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;22(2):108-14.
doi: 10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000052.

A randomized clinical trial to compare the immediate effects of seated thoracic manipulation and targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine flexion range of motion and pain

Steve Karas  1 , Megan J Olson Hunt  2
Affiliations

A randomized clinical trial to compare the immediate effects of seated thoracic manipulation and targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine flexion range of motion and pain

Steve Karas et al. J Man Manip Ther. 2014 May.

Abstract

Design: Randomized clinical trial.

Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of seated thoracic manipulation versus targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine pain and flexion range of motion (ROM). There is evidence that thoracic spine manipulation is an effective treatment for patients with cervical spine pain. This evidence includes a variety of techniques to manipulate the thoracic spine. Although each of them is effective, no research has compared techniques to determine which produces the best outcomes.

Methods: A total of 39 patients with cervical spine pain were randomly assigned to either a seated thoracic manipulation or targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. Pain and flexion ROM measures were taken before and after the intervention.

Results: Pain reduction (post-treatment-pre-treatment) was significantly greater in those patients receiving the targeted supine thoracic manipulation compared to the seated thoracic manipulation (P<0.05). Although not significant, we did observe greater improvement in flexion ROM in the targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. The results of this study indicate that a targeted supine thoracic manipulation may be more effective in reducing cervical spine pain and improving cervical flexion ROM than a seated thoracic manipulation. Future studies should include a variety of patients and physical therapists (PTs) to validate our findings.

Keywords: Cervical spine pain; Orthopedic manipulative therapy; Thoracic spine; Thoracic spine manipulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Seated thoracic manipulation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Targeted supine thoracic manipulation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Targeted supine thoracic manipulation, alternate arm position.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Porterfield J, Derosa C. Mechanical neck pain: perspectives in functional anatomy. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1995.
    1. Greenman P. Principles of manual medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
    1. Evjenth O. Muscle stretching in manual therapy. Sweden: Alfta rehab; 1984.
    1. Maigne R. Orthopedic medicine. Springfield, IL, USA: Charles C. Thomas; 1972.
    1. Grieve G. Common vertebral joint problems. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1981.

LinkOut - more resources