The effect of intrauterine insemination time on semen parameters
- PMID: 24976772
- PMCID: PMC4072555
- DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2014.36776
The effect of intrauterine insemination time on semen parameters
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this observational study was to determine whether semen parameters (concentration, motility) were affected by the interval between the onset of postwash sperm incubation and intrauterine insemination (IUI) time.
Material and methods: Semen specimens of 100 normozoospermic men collected at the clinic were allowed 20 minutes for liquefaction at room temperature. Semen samples were subjected to both macroscopic and microscopic examinations. After centrifugation in a density gradient column and sperm-washing medium, the samples were kept in an incubator. After 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 120 minutes, the concentration and motility were recorded.
Results: According the results of the Bonferroni post hoc test, there were significant differences in values of mean sperm count, percent progressive sperm motility, and total motile sperm count between 30 minutes and 120 minutes (p=0.000, p=0.000, and p=0.000) and between 60 minutes and 120 minutes (p=0.000, p=0.000, and p=0.001), but there was no significant difference between 30 minutes and 60 minutes (p=1, p=0.173, and p=1).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that sperm parameters are negatively affected from prolonged incubation time. A maximum 60-minute limit of the interval between the onset of postwash sperm incubation and IUI time may increase pregnancy rates.
Keywords: IUI time; semen parameters; sperm wash.
Similar articles
-
Intrauterine insemination (IUI) pregnancy outcome is enhanced by shorter intervals from semen collection to sperm wash, from sperm wash to IUI time, and from semen collection to IUI time.Fertil Steril. 2004 Dec;82(6):1638-47. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.061. Fertil Steril. 2004. PMID: 15589871
-
The effect of post-wash total progressive motile sperm count and semen volume on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination cycles: a retrospective study.J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013 Sep 1;14(3):142-5. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.52280. eCollection 2013. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013. PMID: 24592093 Free PMC article.
-
Sperm swim-up: a simple and effective technique of semen processing for intrauterine insemination.J Pak Med Assoc. 2008 Feb;58(2):71-4. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008. PMID: 18333524
-
Semen quality and intrauterine insemination.Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Oct-Nov;7(4):485-92. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61894-9. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003. PMID: 14656412 Review.
-
Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 15;10(10):CD004507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004507.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31612995 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Human live spermatozoa morphology assessment using digital holographic microscopy.Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 22;12(1):4846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08798-6. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35318373 Free PMC article.
-
Deep Learning Based Evaluation of Spermatozoid Motility for Artificial Insemination.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;21(1):72. doi: 10.3390/s21010072. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33374461 Free PMC article.
References
-
- İltemir Duvan C, Berker B, Bayrak O, Aydos K, Özturk Turhan N, Şatıroğlu H. Comparison of semen parameters between pregnant and non-pregnant couples with male factor infertility during intrauterine insemination. Turk J Med Sci. 2009;39:531–6.
-
- Kılıçdağ EB, Bagış T, Haydardedeoğlu B, Tarım E, Aslan E, Erkanlı S, et al. The prognostic factors that could be effect pregnancy rates in intra uterine insemination (IUI) cycles. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol. 2005;2:223–8.
-
- Alıcı B, Özkara H, Önal B, Akkuş E, Hattat H. The effect of total motile sperm count to the success of intrauterine insemination. Cerrahpaşa J Med. 2000;31:61–5.
-
- Miller DC, Hollenbeck BK, Smith GD, Randolph JF, Christman GM, Smith YR, et al. Processed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Urology. 2002;60:497–501. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources