Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 1;2(2):162-185.
doi: 10.3390/admsci2020162.

Past Fame, Present Frames and Future Flagship? An Exploration of How Health is Positioned in Canadian Foreign Policy

Affiliations

Past Fame, Present Frames and Future Flagship? An Exploration of How Health is Positioned in Canadian Foreign Policy

Ronald Labonté et al. Adm Sci. .

Abstract

Canada has been regarded as a model global citizen with firm commitments to multilateralism. It has also played important roles in several international health treaties and conventions in recent years. There are now concerns that its interests in health as a foreign policy goal may be diminishing. This article reports on a thematic analysis of key Canadian foreign policy statements issued over the past decade, and interviews with key informants knowledgeable of, or experienced in the interstices of Canadian health and foreign policy. It finds that health is primarily and increasingly framed in relation to national security and economic interests. Little attention has been given to human rights obligations relevant to health as a foreign policy issue, and global health is not seen as a priority of the present government. Global health is nonetheless regarded as something with which Canadian foreign policy must engage, if only because of Canada's membership in many United Nations and other multilateral fora. Development of a single global health strategy or framework is seen as important to improve intersectoral cooperation on health issues, and foreign policy coherence. There remains a cautious optimism that health could become the base from which Canada reasserts its internationalist status.

Keywords: Canada; development; foreign policy; global health; global health diplomacy; human rights; security; trade.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Foreign Ministers of Brazil; France; Indonesia; Norway; Senegal; South Africa and Thailand. Oslo Ministerial Declaration—Global health: A pressing foreign policy issue of our time. [accessed on 16 January 2012];Lancet. 2007 369:1373–1378. Available online: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)60498-.... - PubMed
    1. Parliamentary Committee on Swedish Global Development Policy. Shared Responsibility: Sweden’s Policy for Global Development. Swedish Government Offices; Stockholm, Sweden: May 15, 2003. [accessed on 16 January 2012]. Swedish government bill 2002/03:122. Available online: http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/574/a/24520.
    1. Swiss Federal Office of Public Health; Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. Swiss Health Foreign Policy: Agreement on Health Foreign Policy Objectives. Swiss Federal Office of Public Health; Geneva, Switzerland: 2006.
    1. Policy Coherence Commission. How Coherent Norwegian Policies can Assist Development in Poor Countries. Policy Coherence Commission; Oslo, Norway: 2008. Coherent for Development?
    1. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Global Health in Foreign and Development Policy: Summary and Introduction; Meld. St. 11 (2011–2012) Report to the Storting (white paper) Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Oslo, Norway: 2012. [accessed on 4 March 2012]. Available online: http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/ud/Documents/propositions-and-reports/R....

LinkOut - more resources