Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul 5:2011:910392.
doi: 10.5402/2011/910392. eCollection 2011.

Patient-Perceived Quality of Life after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Elective versus Traumatological Surgery

Affiliations

Patient-Perceived Quality of Life after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Elective versus Traumatological Surgery

Alessandro Aprato et al. ISRN Orthop. .

Abstract

Purpose. The aim was to evaluate and compare patient's health-related quality of life after THA for osteoarthritis and femoral neck fracture. The postoperative outcome was retrospectively evaluated in patients who underwent THA with an intracapsular femoral neck fracture (Group A) or with an hip osteoarthritis (Group B). Methods. Length discrepancy was measured on postoperative X-rays. Study groups were compared as to age, results of WOMAC and SF-36 tests, limb length discrepancy (LLD) by independent group t-test. Correlations between LLD and results obtained atWOMAC test were performed. 117 patients were enrolled. The 2 groups were similar as to age, type of implanted stem and sex. Mean follow up was 2,4 years for group A and 2,3 years for group B. Results. WOMAC score was found higher in group A in all items examinated. Correlation tests did not indicate a statistically significant linear relationship between LLD and WOMAC score in both groups. Conclusions. Patients who received THA for arthritis have better perception of quality of life than traumatologic patients. Although LLD should always be strongly considered by the surgeons performing a THA, LLD alone can't be considered as an indicator of patient dissatisfaction or clinical bad result after a 2-year followup.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Single item's results at Womac test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Womac score: dimension's results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results at SF-36 test.

References

    1. Leonardsson O, Rogmark C, Kärrholm J, Åkesson K, Garellick G. Outcome after primary and secondary replacement for subcapital fracture of the hip in 10 264 patients. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series B. 2009;91(5):595–600. - PubMed
    1. Xu M, Garbuz DS, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B. Classifying health-related quality of life outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2005;6, article 48 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siggeirsdottir K, Olafsson O, Jonsson H, Iwarsson S, Gudnason V, Jonsson BY. Short hospital stay augmented with education and home-based rehabilitation improves function and quality of life after hip replacement: randomized study of 50 patients with 6 months of follow-up. Acta Orthopaedica. 2005;76(4):555–562. - PubMed
    1. Rogmark C, Johnell O. Primary arthroplasty is better than internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis of 14 randomized studies with 2,289 patients. Acta Orthopaedica. 2006;77(3):359–367. - PubMed
    1. Ackerman IN, Graves SE, Bennell KL, Osborne RH. Evaluating quality of life in hip and knee replacement: psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life short version instrument. Arthritis Care and Research. 2006;55(4):583–590. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources