Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep 6:2013:204346.
doi: 10.5402/2013/204346. eCollection 2013.

A survey of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures

Affiliations

A survey of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures

Ernest K Osei et al. ISRN Radiol. .

Abstract

The quantification of radiation risks associated with radiological examinations has been a subject of interest with the increased use of X-rays. Effective dose, which is a risk-weighted measure of radiation to organs in the body associated with radiological examination, is considered a good indicator of radiological risk. We have therefore investigated patient effective doses from radiological examinations. Organ and effective doses were estimated for 94 patients who underwent computed tomography examinations and for 338 patients who had conventional radiography examinations. The OrgDose (version 2) program was used for the estimation of effective doses. The tube potential ranges: 57 kVp to 138 kVp depending on the examination and patient size. The entrance surface doses have a wide range even for the same examination: 0.44-10.31 mGy (abdomen) and 0.66-16.08 mGy (lumbar spine) and the corresponding effective dose ranges 0.025-0.77 mSv and 0.025-0.95 mSv respectively. Effective dose for adult abdomen-pelvic CT examinations ranges 5.4-19.8 mSv with a mean of 13.6 mSv and for pediatrics ranges 2.1-5.5 mSv with a mean of 2.7 mSv. The mean effective dose for adult chest and head CT examinations are 7.9 and 1.8 mSv respectively and for pediatrics are 1.7 and 1.1 mSv.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Shrimpton PC, Wall BF. The increasing importance of X ray computed tomography as a source of medical exposure. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 1995;57(1–4):413–415.
    1. Cruces RR, García-Granados J, Diaz Romero FJ, Hernández Armas J. Estimation of effective dose in some digital angiographic and interventional procedures. British Journal of Radiology. 1998;71:42–47. - PubMed
    1. ICRP-103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Annals of ICRP. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 2007.
    1. ICRP-60. International Commission on Radiological Protection: Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection—ICRP 60. Annals of ICRP 21. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1990. - PubMed
    1. ICRP-26. International Commission on Radiological, Protection: Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. Annals of the ICRP 26 (ICRP Publication 73) Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1990. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources