Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e101086.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101086. eCollection 2014.

The "Sniffin' Kids" test--a 14-item odor identification test for children

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The "Sniffin' Kids" test--a 14-item odor identification test for children

Valentin A Schriever et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Tools for measuring olfactory function in adults have been well established. Although studies have shown that olfactory impairment in children may occur as a consequence of a number of diseases or head trauma, until today no consensus on how to evaluate the sense of smell in children exists in Europe. Aim of the study was to develop a modified "Sniffin' Sticks" odor identification test, the "Sniffin' Kids" test for the use in children. In this study 537 children between 6-17 years of age were included. Fourteen odors, which were identified at a high rate by children, were selected from the "Sniffin' Sticks" 16-item odor identification test. Normative date for the 14-item "Sniffin' Kids" odor identification test was obtained. The test was validated by including a group of congenital anosmic children. Results show that the "Sniffin' Kids" test is able to discriminate between normosmia and anosmia with a cutoff value of >7 points on the odor identification test. In addition the test-retest reliability was investigated in a group of 31 healthy children and shown to be ρ = 0.44. With the 14-item odor identification "Sniffin' Kids" test we present a valid and reliable test for measuring olfactory function in children between ages 6-17 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The co-author Thomas Hummel is a PLOS ONE Editorial Board member. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE Editorial policies and criteria. All other authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Percentage of correctly identified odors.
Displayed are the percentages of correct identification of the 16-item odor identification test for all children (n = 537). The odors, which were chosen for the 14-item “Sniffin' Kids” test are marked in dark grey. Odors, which were excluded were significantly less often correctly identified and are displayed in light grey.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Odor identification score and age groups.
The boxplot displays the mean odor identification score for all ages. The age groups I, II and III differ significantly by means of odor identification score, while no age difference was obtained within a group. (* = p<0.001).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparing anosmic and healthy children.
Odor identification scores of healthy children, dark grey, (n = 537) and congenital anosmic children, light grey, (n = 25) are shown (means, one standard deviation). Healthy children scored in average 11.22 (1.87) points on the “Sniffin' Kids” test, while congenital anosmic children scored 4.12 (1.59) points. This was significantly different with a p value <0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gudziol V, Lotsch J, Hahner A, Zahnert T, Hummel T (2006) Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing. Laryngoscope 116: 1858–1863. - PubMed
    1. Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M (1984) Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav 32: 489–502. - PubMed
    1. Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A (2007) Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264: 237–243. - PubMed
    1. Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, et al. (1996) "Sniffin' sticks": screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 34: 222–226. - PubMed
    1. Kondo H, Matsuda T, Hashiba M, Baba S (1998) A study of the relationship between the T&T olfactometer and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in a Japanese population. Am J Rhinol 12: 353–358. - PubMed

Publication types