Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul;21(1):23-30.
doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14267.

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 4: radiographic assessment of fusion status

Affiliations
Review

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 4: radiographic assessment of fusion status

Tanvir F Choudhri et al. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

The ability to identify a successful arthrodesis is an essential element in the management of patients undergoing lumbar fusion procedures. The hypothetical gold standard of intraoperative exploration to identify, under direct observation, a solid arthrodesis is an impractical alternative. Therefore, radiographic assessment remains the most viable instrument to evaluate for a successful arthrodesis. Static radiographs, particularly in the presence of instrumentation, are not recommended. In the absence of spinal instrumentation, lack of motion on flexion-extension radiographs is highly suggestive of a successful fusion; however, motion observed at the treated levels does not necessarily predict pseudarthrosis. The degree of motion on dynamic views that would distinguish between a successful arthrodesis and pseudarthrosis has not been clearly defined. Computed tomography with fine-cut axial images and multiplanar views is recommended and appears to be the most sensitive for assessing fusion following instrumented posterolateral and anterior lumbar interbody fusions. For suspected symptomatic pseudarthrosis, a combination of techniques including static and dynamic radiographs as well as CT images is recommended as an option. Lack of facet fusion is considered to be more suggestive of a pseudarthrosis compared with absence of bridging posterolateral bone. Studies exploring additional noninvasive modalities of fusion assessment have demonstrated either poor potential, such as with (99m)Tc bone scans, or provide insufficient information to formulate a definitive recommendation.

Keywords: ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; AP = anteroposterior; NPV = negative predictive value; PLF = posterolateral lumbar fusion; PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion; PPV = positive predictive value; RSA = roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis; diagnostic techniques; fusion; lumbar spine; practice guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Timing of radiographic assessment of fusion.
    Miller JD. Miller JD. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Feb;22(2):219. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE14725. Epub 2014 Nov 21. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. PMID: 25415485 No abstract available.
  • Response.
    Kaiser MG. Kaiser MG. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Feb;22(2):219. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. PMID: 25767844 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms