Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 30:15:52.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-52.

To what extent are the wishes of a signatory reflected in their advance directive: a qualitative analysis

Friedemann Nauck, Matthias Becker, Claudius King, Lukas Radbruch, Raymond Voltz, Birgit Jaspers  1
Affiliations

To what extent are the wishes of a signatory reflected in their advance directive: a qualitative analysis

Friedemann Nauck et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Advance directives (ADs) are assumed to reflect the patients' preferences, even if these are not clearly expressed. Research into whether this assumption is correct has been lacking. This study explores to what extent ADs reflect the true wishes of the signatories.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews (INT), pretest. Transcribed INT and the contents of ADs were inductively categorised (Mayring) and triangulated. Software: MAXQDA 2007.

Participants: Patients receiving palliative care (PPC), healthy (H) and chronically ill (CI) individuals with an AD completed ≥3 months prior to recruitment.

Results: Between 08/2008 and 07/2009, 53 individuals (20 H, 17 CI, 16 PPC) were interviewed (mean age 63.2 years (55-70 years)), 34% male). Most important (in)consistencies between preferences as expressed in INT compared to ADs included preconditions for termination/rejection of life-sustaining measures, refusal of/demand for medical interventions and the nomination of proxies. Standardized AD forms were rarely tailored to the individual. We found a high tendency to use set phrases, such as want to die with dignity or do not want to suffer/vegetate. Likely events in the course of an existing progressive disease were not covered, even in ADs of PPC close to death.

Conclusions: Only some of the incongruities between verbally expressed preferences and the contents of the AD can be put down to use of standardized forms or lack of medical knowledge. Nevertheless, the non-involvement of a doctor in the process of making an AD must be seen as potentially problematic and seeking medical advice should be promoted by politics and physicians. Standardised forms should encourage amendments and present space for free text entries for all aspects covered. Set phrases need to be defined by the individual to enable them to be translated into a specific course of action.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structure of analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bravo G, Dubois MF, Wagneur B. Assessing the effectiveness of interventions to promote advance directives among older adults: a systematic review and multi-level analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1122–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaspers PJ, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Deeg DJH, Pasman HRW. Decision-making capacity and communication about care of older people during their last three months of life. BMC Palliative Care. 2013;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Becker M, Jaspers B, King C, Radbruch L, Voltz R, Nauck F. Did you seek assistance for writing your advance directive? A qualitative study. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010;122(21–22):620–625. - PubMed
    1. Lang FR, Wagner GG. Patient living wills in Germany: conditions for their increase and reasons for refusal. Deutsch Med Wochenschr. 2007;132:2558–2562. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993097. German. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perkins HS. Controlling death: the false promise of advance directives. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(1):51–57. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-1-200707030-00008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types