Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 7:7:18.
doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-7-18. eCollection 2014.

The emergency to home project: impact of an emergency department care coordinator on hospital admission and emergency department utilization among seniors

Affiliations

The emergency to home project: impact of an emergency department care coordinator on hospital admission and emergency department utilization among seniors

Christopher Matthew Bond et al. Int J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Seniors comprise 14% to 21% of all emergency department (ED) visits, yet are disproportionately larger users of ED and inpatient resources. ED care coordinators (EDCCs) target seniors at risk for functional decline and connect them to home care and other community services in hopes of avoiding hospitalization. The goal of this study was to measure the association between the presence of EDCCs and admission rates for seniors aged ≥ 65. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, recidivism at 30 days, and revisit resulting in admission at 30 days.

Methods: This was a matched pairs study using administrative data from eight EDs in six Alberta cities. Four of these hospitals were intervention sites, in which patients were seen by an EDCC, while the other four sites had no EDCC presence. All seniors aged ≥ 65 with a discharge diagnosis of fall or musculoskeletal pathology were included. Cases were matched by CTAS category, age, gender, mode of arrival, and home living environment. McNemar's test for matched pairs was used to compare admission and recidivism rates at EDCC and non-EDCC hospitals. A paired t-test was used to compare length of stay between groups.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences for baseline admission rate, revisit rate at 30 days, and readmission rate at 30 days between EDCC and non-EDCC patients.

Conclusions: This study showed no reduction in senior patients' admission rates, recidivism at 30 days, or hospital length of stay when comparing seniors seen by an EDCC with those not seen by an EDCC.

Keywords: Discharge planning; ED aftercare; Elderly; Falls; Geriatric EM care; Home care; Recidivism; Seniors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow. *Data Sources: E2H Clerical Staff and DIMR (Data Integration, Measurement and Reporting). **Exclusions: Missing outcome data or left ED without being seen.

References

    1. Aminzadeh F, Dalziel WB. Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;7:238–247. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.121523. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McKevitt EC, Calvert E, Ng A, Simons RK, Kirkpatrick AW, Appleton L, Brown DR. Geriatric trauma: resource use and patient outcomes. Can J Surg. 2003;7(3):211–215. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCusker J, Verdon J. Do geriatric interventions reduce emergency department visits? J Gerontol. 2006;7:53–62. - PubMed
    1. Hastings SN, Heflin MT. A systematic review of interventions to improve outcomes for elders discharged from the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;7(10):978–986. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2005.tb00810.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basic D, Conforti D, Rowland J. Standardised assessment of older patients by a nurse in an emergency department. Aust Health Rev. 2002;7:50–58. doi: 10.1071/AH020050. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources