Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Mar;29(3):e139-45.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000189.

Prospective randomized controlled trial using telemedicine for follow-ups in an orthopedic trauma population: a pilot study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prospective randomized controlled trial using telemedicine for follow-ups in an orthopedic trauma population: a pilot study

Vasanth Sathiyakumar et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare patient satisfaction between telemedicine and in-person follow-up appointments for orthopedic trauma.

Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial (pilot study).

Setting: Level I trauma center.

Patients/participants: Twenty-four patients were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups. Eight patients who had telemedicine follow-up appointments and 9 who had in-person follow-up visits were included in a per-protocol analysis. In the telemedicine group, 2 patients left the study because of nonadherence, 1 patient withdrew because of a weak Internet connection, and 1 patient sustained an open fracture. Three control patients left the study because of nonadherence.

Intervention: The patients had 4 follow-up appointments during a 6-month period. Patients either had their 6-week and 6-month follow-ups through video calls or in the clinic.

Main outcome measurements: After 6-week and 6-month follow-up appointments, the patients were given survey questions that were developed using literature-supported methods to compare follow-up experiences. The patients were monitored for complications.

Results: There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between telemedicine and in-person clinic visits (telemedicine: 89% satisfied; control: 100% satisfied; P = 0.74). Zero percent of patients in the telemedicine group took time off their work for their appointment compared with 55.6% in the control (P = 0.03). Telemedicine patients spent significantly less time on their visits (P = 0.01). The majority of the patients in the telemedicine group reported clear visual (87.5%) and sound quality (100%) through and agreed to future follow-up visits through telemedicine (75.0%). One patient in each group developed complications.

Conclusions: Telemedicine may be a viable alternative to some in-person clinic visits because of similar measures of patient satisfaction but with significantly less time and distance traveled.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic level II. See Instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types