Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 1:13:26.
doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-26.

Environmental predictors of West Nile fever risk in Europe

Affiliations

Environmental predictors of West Nile fever risk in Europe

Annelise Tran et al. Int J Health Geogr. .

Abstract

Background: West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne pathogen of global public health importance. Transmission of WNV is determined by abiotic and biotic factors. The objective of this study was to examine environmental variables as predictors of WNV risk in Europe and neighboring countries, considering the anomalies of remotely sensed water and vegetation indices and of temperature at the locations of West Nile fever (WNF) outbreaks reported in humans between 2002 and 2013.

Methods: The status of infection by WNV in relationship to environmental and climatic risk factors was analyzed at the district level using logistic regression models. Temperature, remotely sensed Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) anomalies, as well as population, birds' migratory routes, and presence of wetlands were considered as explanatory variables.

Results: The anomalies of temperature in July, of MNDWI in early June, the presence of wetlands, the location under migratory routes, and the occurrence of a WNF outbreak the previous year were identified as risk factors. The best statistical model according to the Akaike Information Criterion was used to map WNF risk areas in 2012 and 2013. Model validations showed a good level of prediction: area under Receiver Operator Characteristic curve = 0.854 (95% Confidence Interval 0.850-0.856) for internal validation and 0.819 (95% Confidence Interval 0.814-0.823) (2012) and 0.853 (95% Confidence Interval 0.850-0.855) (2013) for external validations, respectively.

Conclusions: WNF incidence is increasing in Europe and WNV is expanding into new areas where it had never been observed before. Our model can be used to direct surveillance activities and public health interventions for the upcoming WNF season.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of West Nile fever outbreaks by year, Europe and neighboring countries between 2002 and 2011. Note: The map represents the number of WNF presence notification by year over the study period (2002–2011).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Anomalies of temperatures and MNDWI values, 2010–2013. a) Monthly anomalies from the perennial mean monthly temperature (July). b) MNDWI anomalies from the 2002–2011 average (21st MODIS period).
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves of the best model of the probability of WNV infection.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Map of predicted probability of WNV infection based on environmental predictors, Europe and neighboring countries, 2012 and 2013.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Study area: location of the West Nile fever outbreaks, Europe and neighbouring countries, 2002–2011, and extent of environmental datasets. Note: the brown box represents the extent of temperature dataset; the green boxes represent the extent of the MODIS tiles.

References

    1. Lanciotti RS, Roehrig JT, Deubel V, Smith J, Parker M, Steele K, Crise B, Volpe KE, Crabtree MB, Scherret JH, Hall RA, MacKenzie JS, Cropp CB, Panigrahy B, Ostlund E, Schmitt B, Malkinson M, Banet C, Weissman J, Komar N, Savage HM, Stone W, McNamara T, Gubler DJ. Origin of the West Nile virus responsible for an outbreak of encephalitis in the northeastern United States. Science. 1999;286(5448):2333–2337. - PubMed
    1. Owen J, Moore F, Panella N, Edwards E, Bru R, Hughes M, Komar N. Migrating birds as dispersal vehicles for West Nile virus. Ecohealth. 2006;3(2):79–85.
    1. Campbell GL, Marfin AA, Lanciotti RS, Gubler DJ. West Nile virus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2(9):519–529. - PubMed
    1. Dauphin G, Zientara S, Zeller H, Murgue B. West Nile: worldwide current situation in animals and humans. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;27(5):343–355. - PubMed
    1. Paz S, Semenza JC. Environmental drivers of West Nile fever epidemiology in Europe and Western Asia–a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(8):3543–3562. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types