Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;5(3):129-33.
doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.134316.

Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals

Mahesh N Belhekar  1 , Supriya S Bhalerao  1 , Renuka P Munshi  1
Affiliations

Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals

Mahesh N Belhekar et al. Perspect Clin Res. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Manuscript authors of scientific journals are expected to report if their studies were conducted according to international and national ethical guidelines and inform readers regarding ethics approval and informed consent obtained from participants and/or their legally acceptable representative/s. In the present study we assessed the reporting practices of ethics approval and informed consent (assent in case of pediatric studies) in four Indian journals.

Materials and methods: Original research articles published over a period of 4 years (2009-2012) in four major national clinical journals, viz. Journal of Association of Physicians of India (JAPI), Indian Journal of Surgery (IJS), Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI), and Indian Journal of Orthopedics (IJO) were reviewed with regard to documentation of ethics approval and written informed consent and assent in case of pediatric participants.

Results: We reviewed 673 research articles and found that, overall ethical approval was mentioned in 163 (24.2%) and informed consent or assent was mentioned in 179 (26.5%) articles in all four journals. Individually we found, in JAPI of the 174 manuscripts reviewed, 74 (42.5%) reported having obtained approval from the ethics committee and 68 (39.1%) reported taking written informed consent from participants. In IJS of 123 manuscripts, 18 (14.6%) reported ethics committee approval and 20 (16.2%) reported informed consent from participants. In JOGI of 152 manuscripts, 21 (13.8%) reported ethics committee approval while 49 (32.2%) reported informed consent from participants. In IJO, of 224 manuscripts, 50 (22.3%) reported ethics committee approval and 42 (18.7%) reported obtaining informed consent.

Conclusion: Majority of the publications did not provide information regarding compliance to ethical guidelines in spite of the availability of various guidelines. Thus, there is a need for awareness and training on bioethics for authors, reviewers, and editors of biomedical journals.

Keywords: Ethical approval; ethics committee; informed consent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The number of research articles with ethical approval and informed consent
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Perkins AC, Choi JM, Kimball AB. Reporting of ethical review of clinical research submitted to the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56:279–84. - PubMed
    1. Nuremberg Code. [Last accessed on 2012 Dec 22]. Available from: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html .
    1. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical esearch involving human subjects. [Last accessed on 2013 Jan 12];J Postgrad Med. 2002 48:206–8. Available from: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm . - PubMed
    1. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva: 2002. [Last assessed on 2013 April 15]. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) Available from: http://www.cioms.ch/publications/layout_guide2002.pdf . - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. CONSORT. The CONSORT Statement: Revised recommendation for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. [Last accessed on 2013 Apr 16];BMC Med Res Method. 2001 1:2. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/1/2 . - PMC - PubMed