Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;4(1):45-50.
doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.133077.

Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study

Affiliations

Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study

Serdar Yüce et al. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, according to the location of the defect, in choosing the surgery treatment method. Factors affecting the results and different treatment methods of the anatomical region, including its difficult reconstruction, will also be included.

Materials and methods: A review of 177 periorbital region defect reconstructions was performed.

Results: As a treatment method, in 76 (43%) patients primary closure was chosen, 39 (22%) patients had grafts and in 62 (35%) patients a flap was chosen as a treatment alternative. With respect to postoperative complications, there were a total of 6 (3.38%) patients observed with venous congestion. In 11 (6.21%) patients ectropion developed, in 1 (0.56%) patient minimal space between the eyelids while monitoring recovery was observed and in 1 (0.56%) patient, flap loss was observed due to a circulatory disorder.

Conclusions: The aim of reconstruction is to repair the defect suitable to normal physiological and anatomical values. As a result, before the surgical treatments in this difficult anatomical region, the defect width and anatomical localization must be evaluated. The most suitable reconstruction method must be identified, using an evaluation of the algorithm and the required functional and esthetical results can be obtained with intraoperative flexible behavior and a change of method, when necessary.

Keywords: Algorithm; periorbital defects; reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Preoperative appearance of the tumoral lesion in the left upper eyelid, (b) Appearance of the planning after excision, (c) Appearance of the split thickness upper eyelid defect after excision and harvested orbicularis oculi myocutaneous V-Y advancement flap, (d) Postoperative appearance of the normal closure of the eyelid
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Preoperative appearance of the tumoral lesion in the right lower eyelid, (b) Appearance of the split thickness lower eyelid defect, after excision, and harvested Mustarde cheek rotation flap, (c) Postoperative appearance of the early result, (d) Postoperative appearance of the late result
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Preoperative appearance of the tumoral lesion in the right lower eyelid, (b) Appearance of the preoperative two-different planing, (c) Appearance of the full thickness lower eyelid defect, after excision, and harvested superficial temporal artery frontal branch based island flap, (d) Postoperative appearance of the early result
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Preoperative anterior appearance of the tumoral lesion in the right medial canthal region, (b) Preoperative oblique appearance of the tumoral lesion in the right medial canthal region, (c) Postoperative appearance of the early result of the glabellar flap, (d) Postoperative appearance of the late result of the glabellar flap

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Codner MA. Reconstruction of the eyelids and orbit. In: Coleman JJ 3rd, editor. Plastic Surgery Indications, Operations and Outcomes. Ch. 87. Vol. 3. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000. pp. 1425–64. Sayfa.
    1. Spinelli HM, Jelks GW. Periocular reconstruction: A systematic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91:1017–24. - PubMed
    1. Köse R. Periorbital yumuşak dokuların onarımı. Fırat Tıp Derg. 2005;10:12–7.
    1. Patel BC, Flaharty PM, Anderson RL. Reconstruction of the eyelids. In: Baker SR, Swanson NA, editors. Local Flaps in Facial Reconstruction. Ch. 16. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995.
    1. Demir Z, Yüce S, Karamürsel S, Celebioglu S. Orbicularis oculi myocutaneous advancement flap for upper eyelid reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:443–50. - PubMed