Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 2;9(7):e99465.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099465. eCollection 2014.

Infra-population and -community dynamics of the parasites Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae, and consequences for honey bee (Apis mellifera) hosts

Affiliations

Infra-population and -community dynamics of the parasites Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae, and consequences for honey bee (Apis mellifera) hosts

Geoffrey R Williams et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Nosema spp. fungal gut parasites are among myriad possible explanations for contemporary increased mortality of western honey bees (Apis mellifera, hereafter honey bee) in many regions of the world. Invasive Nosema ceranae is particularly worrisome because some evidence suggests it has greater virulence than its congener N. apis. N. ceranae appears to have recently switched hosts from Asian honey bees (Apis cerana) and now has a nearly global distribution in honey bees, apparently displacing N. apis. We examined parasite reproduction and effects of N. apis, N. ceranae, and mixed Nosema infections on honey bee hosts in laboratory experiments. Both infection intensity and honey bee mortality were significantly greater for N. ceranae than for N. apis or mixed infections; mixed infection resulted in mortality similar to N. apis parasitism and reduced spore intensity, possibly due to inter-specific competition. This is the first long-term laboratory study to demonstrate lethal consequences of N. apis and N. ceranae and mixed Nosema parasitism in honey bees, and suggests that differences in reproduction and intra-host competition may explain apparent heterogeneous exclusion of the historic parasite by the invasive species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: R.E.L.R. has since joined funder Bayer CropScience. The authors have declared that no other competing interests exist. Richard E.L. Rogers is employed by Bayer CropScience, a company involved in seeds, crop protection, and pest control. During experiment conception and data collection he was proprietor of Wildwood Labs, a now defunct bioscience consultancy firm that had received contracts from Bayer CropScience to conduct crop protection field studies. Since joining Bayer CropScience, he was not involved in data collection, analyses, interpreting, or reporting for this experiment. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Effect of Nosema infection on mortality of adult worker western honey bees (Apis mellifera).
Mortality is shown as the cumulative percentage of dead individuals from control, Nosema apis, Nosema ceranae and mixed N. apis/N. ceranae treatments each day. The experiment was terminated at 30 d post inoculation. Treatments with different letters had significant differences in mortality.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effect of Nosema infection on adult worker western honey bee (Apis mellifera) nutritional demand.
Consumption is shown as volume of 50% (weight/volume) sucrose-water mixture per bee per week post inoculation for control, Nosema apis, Nosema ceranae, and mixed N. apis/N. ceranae treatments (Week 4 included only consumption from 22–25 d post inoculation). Boxplots show interquartile range (box), median (black or white line within interquartile range), data range (dashed vertical lines), and outliers (open dots); asterisks (black or white) represent means. No significant differences were observed among treatments for daily consumption per worker.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Level of Nosema infection in dead adult worker western honey bees (Apis mellifera) 28–30 d post oral inoculation for control, Nosema apis, Nosema ceranae and mixed N. apis/N. ceranae treatments.
Boxplots show interquartile range (box), median (black line within interquartile range), data range (dashed vertical lines), and outliers (open dots); asterisks (black) represent means. Horizontal square parenthesis under boxplots indicates a significant difference; controls were excluded from analyses because no infections were observed.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Levels of Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae DNA (square root-transformed) in adult worker western honey bees (Apis mellifera) that died between 28 and 30 d post inoculation in N. apis, N. ceranae or mixed N. apis/N. ceranae treatments (same workers shown in Fig. 3 ).
Boxplots show interquartile range (box), median (black or white line within interquartile range), data range (dashed vertical lines), and outliers (open dots); asterisks (black or white) represent means. No significant differences were observed in quantities among the four instances where we expected to find DNA (i.e., the boxes with means above 0).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Nosema infection intensities in live-sampled adult worker western honey bees (Apis mellifera) at 7, 14, and 21 d post oral inoculation in control, Nosema apis, Nosema ceranae, and mixed N. apis/N. ceranae treatments.
Boxplots show interquartile range (box), median (black or white line within interquartile range), data range (dashed vertical lines), and outliers (open dots); asterisks (black or white) represent means. Horizontal square parenthesis under boxplots indicates a significant difference; controls were excluded from analyses because no infections were observed.

References

    1. Klein AM, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, et al. (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 274: 303–313. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aizen MA, Harder LD (2009) The global stock of domesticated honey bees is growing slower than agricultural demand for pollination. Current Biology 19: 915–918. - PubMed
    1. Neumann P, Carreck NL (2010) Honey bee colony losses. Journal of Apicultural Research 49: 1–6.
    1. vanEngelsdorp D, Meixner MD (2010) A historical review of managed honey bee populations in Europe and the United States and the factors that may affect them. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 103: S80–S95. - PubMed
    1. Williams GR, Tarpy DR, Vanengelsdorp D, Chauzat MP, Cox-Foster DL, et al. (2010) Colony Collapse Disorder in context. Bioessays 32: 845–846. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types