Adverse skin reactions to iodinated x-ray contrast agents in healthy rats

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this preclinical study on healthy Sprague-Dawley rats was to determine whether differences exist in the induction of adverse skin reactions after the intravenous administration of a monomeric and 2 dimeric iodinated nonionic contrast agents.

Materials and methods: After intravenous injection of iopromide (monomeric), iodixanol (dimeric), and iotrolan (dimeric) at a dose of 4 g iodine/kg of body weight, mechanical ear volume measurements (10 minute after injection) and intravital microscopy (baseline, 5 minutes after injection) of the ear with the near-infrared dye indocyanine green were performed to determine the volume change and plasma extravasation. Histopathological analysis (20 minutes, 1 hour, and 3 hours after injection) was performed to diagnose alterations in the skin. Blood plasma was analyzed to identify elevated levels of histamine (5 minutes after injection) and inflammatory markers (a multianalyte profile of 58 markers; 1 hour and 3 hours after injection).

Results: Only iodixanol induced immediate angioedema formation, with a 100% incidence rate and with slight mast cell infiltration in the ear, muzzle, and paws. The ear showed a 53% volume increase and strong extravasation of plasma proteins into the interstitium, which correlated with highly (11-fold) increased plasma histamine levels 5 minutes after injection. Elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (7.1-fold), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α (3.2-fold), and MIP-2 (7.7-fold) were identified 1 hour after the iodixanol injection. Increased levels (fold-change) of MIP-1β (14; 6.3), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (3.3; 3.7), monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (2.4; 3.0), stem cell factor (1.7; 2), vascular endothelial growth factor (2; 2.1), and interferon gamma-induced protein-10 (4.1; 39.1) were identified 1 hour and 3 hours after the iodixanol administration, respectively. The level of these molecules remained unchanged after the iopromide and iotrolan injections (except for stem cell factor).

Conclusions: A reversible anaphylactoid-like reaction in healthy Sprague-Dawley rats was observed after the iodixanol administration but not after the monomeric iopromide or dimeric iotrolan injections. Therefore, we conclude that the induction of adverse skin reactions is not per se because of a class effect of dimeric contrast agent.