Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;41(7):070601.
doi: 10.1118/1.4881095.

Point/Counterpoint: low-dose radiation is beneficial, not harmful

Affiliations

Point/Counterpoint: low-dose radiation is beneficial, not harmful

Mohan Doss et al. Med Phys. 2014 Jul.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Feinendegen L. E., Pollycove M., and Neumann R. D., “Hormesis by low dose radiation effects: Low-dose cancer risk modeling must recognize up-regulation of protection,” in Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, edited by Baum R. P. (Springer, Berlin, 2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doss M., “Shifting the paradigm in radiation safety,” Dose-Response 10, 562–583 (2012).10.2203/dose-response.11-056.Doss - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen B., “The cancer risk from low-level radiation,” in Radiation Dose from Adult and Pediatric Multidetector Computed Tomography, edited by Tack D. and Gevenois P. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007), pp. 33–49
    1. Doss M., “Linear no-threshold model vs. radiation hormesis,” Dose Response 11, 480–497 (2013).10.2203/dose-response.13-005.Doss - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sasaki M. S., Tachibana A., and Takeda S., “Cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation: artificial neural networks inference from atomic bomb survivors,” J. Radiat. Res. 55(3), 391–406 (2014).10.1093/jrr/rrt133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources