Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2014 Sep;57(9):1746-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3314-9. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

Time for large randomised trials of vitamin D for women with gestational diabetes mellitus to improve perinatal health outcomes

Affiliations
Comment

Time for large randomised trials of vitamin D for women with gestational diabetes mellitus to improve perinatal health outcomes

Heather H Burris et al. Diabetologia. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects 7-14% of pregnancies in the USA and its incidence is rising. Several small trials have demonstrated improved insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance with vitamin D supplementation among women with GDM. In this issue of Diabetologia (DOI: 10.1007/s00125-014-3293-x ), Asemi and colleagues report that co-supplementation of vitamin D and calcium among women with diet-controlled GDM improves several biomarkers of metabolic status, including insulin, glucose and cholesterol. Whether such improvements in biomarkers would translate into clinically meaningful reductions in the harmful sequelae of GDM remains unknown. The promising results from Asemi and colleagues justify investment in large randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of vitamin D (with or without calcium) for women with GDM. Such trials should be powered for perinatal outcomes such as Caesarean section for macrosomia, postnatal hypoglycaemia and respiratory distress; ideally, the trials would include long-term follow-up of mothers and infants for later metabolic consequences of GDM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Duality of interest:

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Comment on

References

    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 504: screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:751–753. - PubMed
    1. Jovanovic L, Pettitt DJ. Gestational diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001;286:2516–2518. - PubMed
    1. Reece EA, Leguizamon G, Wiznitzer A. Gestational diabetes: the need for a common ground. Lancet. 2009;373:1789–1797. - PubMed
    1. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:406–416. - PubMed
    1. Ferrara A, Kahn HS, Quesenberry CP, Riley C, Hedderson MM. An increase in the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus: Northern California, 1991–2000. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:526–533. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources