Rate of and Risk Factors for Reoperations After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada
- PMID: 24990977
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00607
Rate of and Risk Factors for Reoperations After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada
Abstract
Background: Reoperation rates following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of midshaft clavicle fractures have been described, but reported rates of nonunion, malunion, infection, and implant removal have varied. We sought to establish baseline rates of, and risk factors for, reoperations following clavicle ORIF in a large population cohort.
Methods: Administrative databases were used to identify patients sixteen to sixty years of age who had undergone an ORIF of a closed, midshaft clavicle fracture from April 2002 to April 2010. The primary outcome was a reoperation within two years (isolated implant removal, irrigation and debridement [deep infection], pseudarthrosis reconstruction [nonunion], or clavicle osteotomy [malunion]). The secondary outcome was rare perioperative complications, including pneumothorax, subclavian vasculature injury, and brachial plexus injury. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the influence of patient and provider factors on these outcomes.
Results: We identified 1350 patients who underwent midshaft clavicle ORIF (median age, thirty-two years [interquartile range, twenty-one to forty-four years]; 81.3% male). One in four patients (24.6%) underwent at least one clavicle reoperation. The most common procedure was isolated implant removal (18.8%), and females were at highest risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; p = 0.002). The median time to implant removal was twelve months. A reoperation secondary to nonunion, deep infection, and malunion occurred in 2.6%, 2.6%, and 1.1% of the patients after a median of six, five, and fourteen months, respectively. Risk factors for clavicle nonunion included female sex (OR, 2.2; p = 0.04) and a high comorbidity score (OR, 2.8; p = 0.009). For surgeons, fewer years in practice was associated with a small risk of the patient developing an infection (OR, 1.1; p < 0.001). Sixteen pneumothoraces (1.2%) were identified; however, brachial plexus and subclavian vessel injuries were each found in five or fewer patients.
Conclusions: Following clavicle ORIF, one in four patients underwent a reoperation. The most common procedure was implant removal, and although the rates of reoperations secondary to nonunion, malunion, and infection were low they were higher than previously reported. Pneumothoraces and neurovascular injuries were infrequent and should continue to be considered rare complications of clavicle ORIF.
Level of evidence: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic Factors for Reoperation After Plate Fixation of the Midshaft Clavicle.J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Dec;29(12):533-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000331. J Orthop Trauma. 2015. PMID: 26131565
-
Rate of and Risk Factors for Intermediate-Term Reoperation After Ankle Fracture Fixation: A Population-Based Cohort Study.J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Oct;31(10):e315-e320. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000920. J Orthop Trauma. 2017. PMID: 28614147
-
Midshaft Fractures of the Clavicle: A Meta-analysis Comparing Surgical Fixation Using Anteroinferior Plating Versus Superior Plating.J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Sep;31(9):461-467. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000936. J Orthop Trauma. 2017. PMID: 28708779 Review.
-
Complications After Plate Fixation of Displaced Pediatric Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Aug;38(7):350-353. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000832. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018. PMID: 27379787
-
Complications and Outcomes After Surgical Intervention in Clavicular Nonunion: A Systematic Review.JBJS Rev. 2023 Jan 24;11(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.22.00171. eCollection 2023 Jan 1. JBJS Rev. 2023. PMID: 36722838
Cited by
-
Clavicle midshaft fractures should not be considered an easy surgery: reduction and prebending.Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Dec;26(4):341-342. doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.00976. Epub 2023 Dec 1. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023. PMID: 38052504 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Midshaft clavicle fractures: Current concepts.EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Jun 20;3(6):374-380. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170033. eCollection 2018 Jun. EFORT Open Rev. 2018. PMID: 30034818 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of distal end clavicle fractures treated with locking plates.Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Feb;20(1):45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.05.003. Epub 2017 Jan 20. Chin J Traumatol. 2017. PMID: 28233729 Free PMC article.
-
Can 3D-printing avoid discomfort-related implant removal in midshaft clavicle fractures? A four-year follow-up.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Nov;141(11):1899-1907. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03654-6. Epub 2020 Oct 31. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021. PMID: 33128609 Free PMC article.
-
Finite element modeling of clavicle fracture fixations: a systematic scoping review.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025 Jun;63(6):1585-1607. doi: 10.1007/s11517-025-03294-1. Epub 2025 Jan 28. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025. PMID: 39873960 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous