Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e100588.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100588. eCollection 2014.

Climate-driven effects of fire on winter habitat for caribou in the Alaskan-Yukon Arctic

Affiliations

Climate-driven effects of fire on winter habitat for caribou in the Alaskan-Yukon Arctic

David D Gustine et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

  • PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e112584

Abstract

Climatic warming has direct implications for fire-dominated disturbance patterns in northern ecosystems. A transforming wildfire regime is altering plant composition and successional patterns, thus affecting the distribution and potentially the abundance of large herbivores. Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) are an important subsistence resource for communities throughout the north and a species that depends on terrestrial lichen in late-successional forests and tundra systems. Projected increases in area burned and reductions in stand ages may reduce lichen availability within caribou winter ranges. Sufficient reductions in lichen abundance could alter the capacity of these areas to support caribou populations. To assess the potential role of a changing fire regime on winter habitat for caribou, we used a simulation modeling platform, two global circulation models (GCMs), and a moderate emissions scenario to project annual fire characteristics and the resulting abundance of lichen-producing vegetation types (i.e., spruce forests and tundra >60 years old) across a modeling domain that encompassed the winter ranges of the Central Arctic and Porcupine caribou herds in the Alaskan-Yukon Arctic. Fires were less numerous and smaller in tundra compared to spruce habitats throughout the 90-year projection for both GCMs. Given the more likely climate trajectory, we projected that the Porcupine caribou herd, which winters primarily in the boreal forest, could be expected to experience a greater reduction in lichen-producing winter habitats (-21%) than the Central Arctic herd that wintered primarily in the arctic tundra (-11%). Our results suggest that caribou herds wintering in boreal forest will undergo fire-driven reductions in lichen-producing habitats that will, at a minimum, alter their distribution. Range shifts of caribou resulting from fire-driven changes to winter habitat may diminish access to caribou for rural communities that reside in fire-prone areas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Simulation domain and winter ranges of the Central Arctic and Porcupine caribou herds, Alaska and Yukon.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simulated proportion of the winter ranges of the Central Arctic and Porcupine caribou herds in northern Alaska and Yukon that were covered in lichen-producing (>60 y) tundra (a, b) and spruce forest (c, d) under a moderate emissions scenario (A1B) for the warm [Canadian Center for Climate Modeling Analysis Coupled Global Climate Model 3.1 (a, c)] and hot [Max Planck Institute European Center-Hamburg 5 Model (b, d)] global circulation models, Alaska and Yukon.
Representative runs are denoted by solid lines and the 5th and 95th percentiles are denoted by dashed lines.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relative flammability under a moderate emissions scenario (A1B) for the warm [Canadian Center for Climate Modeling Analysis Coupled Global Climate Model 3.1 (top panel)] and hot [Max Planck Institute European Center-Hamburg 5 Model (bottom panel)] global circulation models in the winter ranges of the Central Arctic and Porcupine caribou herds, Alaska and Yukon, 2010–2100.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Differences in relative flammability of vegetation between the warm (Canadian Center for Climate Modeling Analysis Coupled Global Climate Model 3.1) and hot (Max Planck Institute European Center-Hamburg 5 Model) global circulation models under a moderate emissions scenario (A1B) in the winter ranges of the Central Arctic and Porcupine caribou herds, Alaska and Yukon, 2010–2100.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rupp TS, Chen X, McGuire AD (2007) Sensitivity of simulated boreal fire dynamics to uncertainties in climate drivers. Earth Interactions 11: 1–21.
    1. Field CB, Boesch DF, Chapin III FS, Gleick PH, Janetos AC, et al... (2008) National Research Council. Washington, DC: Ecological impacts of climate change. The National Academies Press. 58 p.
    1. Duffy PA, Walsh JE, Graham JM, Mann DH, Rupp TS (2005) Impacts of large-scale atmospheric-ocean variability on Alaskan fire season severity. Ecological Applications 15: 1317–1330.
    1. Kasischke ES, Turetsky MR (2006) Recent changes in the fire regime across the North American boreal region - spatial and temporal patterns of burning across Canada and Alaska. Geophysical Research Letters 33..
    1. Flannigan M, Logan KA, Amiro BD, Skinner WR, Stocks BJ (2005) Future area burned in Canada. Climate Change 72: 1–16.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources