Determining the activation of gluteus medius and the validity of the single leg stance test in chronic, nonspecific low back pain
- PMID: 24992020
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.009
Determining the activation of gluteus medius and the validity of the single leg stance test in chronic, nonspecific low back pain
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the activation of the gluteus medius in persons with chronic, nonspecific low back pain compared with that in control subjects, and to determine the association of the clinical rating of the single leg stance (SLS) with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and gluteus medius weakness.
Design: Cohort-control comparison.
Setting: Academic research laboratory.
Participants: Convenience sample of people (n=21) with CLBP (>12wk) recruited by local physiotherapists, and age- and sex-matched controls (n=22). Subjects who received specific pain diagnoses were excluded.
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main outcome measures: Back pain using the visual analog scale (mm); back-related disability using the Oswestry Back Disability Index (%); strength of gluteus medius measured using a hand dynamometer (N/kg); SLS test; gluteus medius onset and activation using electromyography during unipedal stance on a forceplate.
Results: Individuals in the CLBP group exhibited significant weakness in the gluteus medius compared with controls (right, P=.04; left, P=.002). They also had more pain (CLBP: mean, 20.50mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.11-27.9mm; control subjects: mean, 1.77mm; 95% CI, -.21 to 3.75mm) and back-related disability (CLBP: mean, 18.52%; 95% CI, 14.46%-22.59%; control subjects: mean, .68%; 95% CI, -.41% to 1.77%), and reported being less physically active. Weakness was accompanied by increased gluteus medius activation during unipedal stance (R=.50, P=.001) but by no difference in muscle onset times. Although greater gluteus medius weakness was associated with greater pain and disability, there was no difference in muscle strength between those scoring positive and negative on the SLS test (right: F=.002, P=.96; left: F=.1.75, P=.19).
Conclusions: Individuals with CLBP had weaker gluteus medius muscles than control subjects without back pain. Even though there was no significant difference in onset time of the gluteus medius when moving to unipedal stance between the groups, the CLBP group had greater gluteus medius activation. A key finding was that a positive SLS test did not distinguish the CLBP group from the control group, nor was it a sign of gluteus medius weakness.
Keywords: Buttocks; Chronic pain; Electromyography; Low back pain; Muscle strength; Physical therapy modalities; Rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence of gluteus medius weakness in people with chronic low back pain compared to healthy controls.Eur Spine J. 2016 Apr;25(4):1258-65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4027-6. Epub 2015 May 26. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 26006705
-
Gluteus medius muscle activation patterns as a predictor of low back pain during standing.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008 Jun;23(5):545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Feb 20. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008. PMID: 18282648
-
Muscle activation levels of the gluteus maximus and medius during standing hip-joint strengthening exercises using elastic-tubing resistance.J Sport Rehabil. 2014 Feb;23(1):1-11. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2012-0082. Epub 2013 Aug 6. J Sport Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 23921445
-
Gluteus medius muscle function in people with and without low back pain: a systematic review.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 22;20(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2833-4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019. PMID: 31638962 Free PMC article.
-
A literature review of studies evaluating gluteus maximus and gluteus medius activation during rehabilitation exercises.Physiother Theory Pract. 2012 May;28(4):257-68. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2011.604981. Epub 2011 Oct 18. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012. PMID: 22007858 Review.
Cited by
-
Lumbar stabilisation exercises versus back endurance-resistance exercise training in athletes with chronic low back pain: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Nov 22;4(1):e000452. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000452. eCollection 2018. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018. PMID: 30555717 Free PMC article.
-
Is there hip muscle weakness in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain? A cross-sectional study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 7;24(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06920-x. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 37805476 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Piriformis Thickness, Hip Muscle Strength, and Low Back Pain Patients with and without Piriformis Syndrome in Malaysia.Life (Basel). 2023 May 18;13(5):1208. doi: 10.3390/life13051208. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37240853 Free PMC article.
-
Specific pelvic shape in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip on 3D morphometric homologous model analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jun 3;19(6):e0300938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300938. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38829863 Free PMC article.
-
Vitamin D and Pain: Vitamin D and Its Role in the Aetiology and Maintenance of Chronic Pain States and Associated Comorbidities.Pain Res Treat. 2015;2015:904967. doi: 10.1155/2015/904967. Epub 2015 Apr 19. Pain Res Treat. 2015. PMID: 26090221 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical