Comparison of epidermal/dermal damage between the long-pulsed 1064 nm Nd:YAG and 755 nm alexandrite lasers under relatively high fluence conditions: quantitative and histological assessments
- PMID: 24992273
- PMCID: PMC4082359
- DOI: 10.1089/pho.2013.3665
Comparison of epidermal/dermal damage between the long-pulsed 1064 nm Nd:YAG and 755 nm alexandrite lasers under relatively high fluence conditions: quantitative and histological assessments
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare degrees of epidermal/dermal tissue damage quantitatively and histologically after laser irradiation, to find ideal treatment conditions with relatively high fluence for skin rejuvenation.
Background data: A number of recent studies have evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of therapeutic lasers under relatively low fluence conditions.
Methods: We transmitted the long-pulsed 1064 nm Nd:YAG and 755 nm Alexandrite lasers into pig skin according to different fluences and spot diameters, and estimated epidermal/dermal temperatures. Pig skin specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological assessments. The fluence conditions comprised 26, 30, and 36 J/cm2, and the spot diameter conditions were 5, 8, and 10 mm. Pulse duration was 30 ms for all experiments.
Results: Both lasers produced reliable thermal damage on the dermis without any serious epidermal injuries, under relatively high fluence conditions. The 1064 nm laser provided more active fibrous formations than the 755 nm laser, while higher risks for tissue damages simultaneously occurred.
Conclusions: The ideal treatment conditions for skin rejuvenation were 8 mm diameter with 30 J/cm2 and 10 mm diameter with 26 J/cm2 for the 1064 nm laser, and 8 mm diameter with 36 J/cm2 and 10 mm diameter with 26 J/cm2 for the 755 nm laser.
Figures





Similar articles
-
The effects of 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser irradiation under the different treatment conditions for skin rejuvenation: quantitative and histologic analyses.Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Jun;31(6):283-92. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3483. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013. PMID: 23741996
-
Ablation of porcine ligamentum flavum with Ho:YAG, q-switched Ho:YAG, and quadrupled Nd:YAG lasers.Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Dec;47(10):839-51. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22424. Epub 2015 Sep 28. Lasers Surg Med. 2015. PMID: 26415136 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of epidermal/dermal temperature changes according to the different cryogen spray cooling conditions.Technol Health Care. 2015;24 Suppl 1:S11-6. doi: 10.3233/THC-151047. Epub 2015 Sep 10. Technol Health Care. 2015. PMID: 26684562
-
Delivery of light to the skin through ablated conduits.Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Jan;49(1):69-77. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22533. Epub 2016 May 19. Lasers Surg Med. 2017. PMID: 27197620 Review.
-
Vascular lasers and IPLS: guidelines for care from the European Society for Laser Dermatology (ESLD).J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007 Jun;9(2):113-24. doi: 10.1080/14764170701280693. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007. PMID: 17558762 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of Laser Effects on Skin Rejuvenation.J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Spring;11(2):212-219. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.35. Epub 2020 Mar 15. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32273965 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Picosecond Alexandrite Laser With Diffractive Lens Array Combined With Long-Pulse Alexandrite Laser for the Treatment of Facial Photoaging in Chinese Women: A Retrospective Study.Skin Res Technol. 2024 Oct;30(10):e70091. doi: 10.1111/srt.70091. Skin Res Technol. 2024. PMID: 39362837 Free PMC article.
-
A split-face comparison of Q-switched Nd:YAG 1064-nm laser for facial rejuvenation in Nevus of Ota patients.Lasers Med Sci. 2017 May;32(4):765-769. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2161-6. Epub 2017 Mar 15. Lasers Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 28299489 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Combined Application of Three Modes of 2940-nm Erbium:YAG and 1064-nm Neodymium:YAG Lasers in Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 16;15:3065-3073. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S318013. eCollection 2021. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 34295145 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Munavalli G.S., Weiss R.A., and Halder R.M. (2005). Photoaging and nonablative photorejuvenation in ethnic skin. Dermatol. Surg. 31, 1250–1260 - PubMed
-
- Goldberg D.J., and Samady J.A. (2001). Intense pulsed light and Nd:YAG laser non-ablative treatment of facial rhytids. Lasers Surg. Med. 28, 141–144 - PubMed
-
- Newman J. (2001). Nonablative laser skin tightening. Facial Plast. Surg. Clin. North Am. 9, 343–349 - PubMed
-
- Ross E.V., Sajben F.P., Hsia J., Barnette D., Miller C.H., and McKinlay J.R. (2000). Nonablative skin remodeling: selective dermal heating with a mid-infrared laser and contact cooling combination. Lasers Surg. Med. 26, 186–195 - PubMed
-
- Doshi S.N., and Alster T.S. (2005). Combination radiofrequency and diode laser for treatment of facial rhytides and skin laxity. J. Cosmet. Laser Ther. 7, 11–15 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources