Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 26;111(5):965-9.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.362. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

50 years of screening in the Nordic countries: quantifying the effects on cervical cancer incidence

Affiliations

50 years of screening in the Nordic countries: quantifying the effects on cervical cancer incidence

S Vaccarella et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Nordic countries' data offer a unique possibility to evaluate the long-term benefit of cervical cancer screening in a context of increasing risk of human papillomavirus infection.

Methods: Ad hoc-refined age-period-cohort models were applied to the last 50-year incidence data from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden to project expected cervical cancer cases in a no-screening scenario.

Results: In the absence of screening, projected incidence rates for 2006-2010 in Nordic countries would have been between 3 and 5 times higher than observed rates. Over 60,000 cases or between 41 and 49% of the expected cases of cervical cancer may have been prevented by the introduction of screening in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that screening programmes might have prevented a HPV-driven epidemic of cervical cancer in Nordic countries. According to extrapolations from cohort effects, cervical cancer incidence rates in the Nordic countries would have been otherwise comparable to the highest incidence rates currently detected in low-income countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of age, period and cohort on observed and projected ASRs of incident cervical cancer. Age-standardised rates (ASRs) are plotted by period. Age effects and ASRs are shown on a rate per 100 000 scale; cohort and period effects are on a relative risk scale. Reference points for period and cohort rate ratios are marked. Under a scenario without screening activities, period effects are forced to assume a constant value over time (dot-dashed lines). The projected ASRs corresponding to period effects constant over time, but age and cohort effects as estimated by the model, are also shown (dashed thick lines).

References

    1. Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparen P, Silfverdal L, Strander B, Ryd W, Dillner J, Tornberg S. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:622–629. - PubMed
    1. Anttila A, Nieminen P. Cervical cancer screening programme in Finland with an example on implementing alternative screening methods. Coll Antropol. 2007;31 (Suppl 2:17–22. - PubMed
    1. Anttila A, Ronco G, Clifford G, Bray F, Hakama M, Arbyn M, Weiderpass E. Cervical cancer screening programmes and policies in 18 European countries. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:935–941. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M, Antoine J, Magi M, Smailyte G, Stengrevics A, Suteu O, Valerianova Z, Bray F, Weiderpass E. Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in the Baltic countries, Bulgaria and Romania. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:1899–1907. - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:790–801. - PubMed

MeSH terms