Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul 3;4(7):e005028.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005028.

Rapid paediatric fluid resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficiency of two provider-endorsed manual paediatric fluid resuscitation techniques in a simulated setting

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Rapid paediatric fluid resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficiency of two provider-endorsed manual paediatric fluid resuscitation techniques in a simulated setting

Evan T Cole et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Manual techniques of intravascular fluid administration are commonly used during paediatric resuscitation, although it is unclear which technique is most efficient in the hands of typical healthcare providers. We compared the rate of fluid administration achieved with the disconnect-reconnect and push-pull manual syringe techniques for paediatric fluid resuscitation in a simulated setting.

Methods: This study utilised a randomised crossover trial design and enrolled 16 consenting healthcare provider participants from a Canadian paediatric tertiary care centre. The study was conducted in a non-clinical setting using a model simulating a 15 kg child in decompensated shock. Participants administered 900 mL (60 mL/kg) of normal saline to the simulated patient using each of the two techniques under study. The primary outcome was the rate of fluid administration, as determined by two blinded independent video reviewers. We also collected participant demographic data and evaluated other secondary outcomes including total volume administered, number of catheter dislodgements, number of technical errors, and subjective and objective measures of provider fatigue.

Results: All 16 participants completed the trial. The mean (SD) rate of fluid administration (mL/s) was greater for the disconnect-reconnect technique at 1.77 (0.145) than it was for the push-pull technique at 1.62 (0.226), with a mean difference of 0.15 (95% CI 0.055 to 0.251; p=0.005). There was no difference in mean volume administered (p=0.778) or participant self-reported fatigue (p=0.736) between techniques. No catheter dislodgement events occurred.

Conclusions: The disconnect-reconnect technique allowed for the fastest rate of fluid administration, suggesting that use of this technique may be preferable in situations requiring rapid resuscitation. These findings may help to inform future iterations of paediatric resuscitation guidelines.

Trial registration number: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT01774214] prior to enrolling the first participant.

Keywords: ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; INTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE; TRAUMA MANAGEMENT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A–C) The ‘Disconnectreconnect’ technique (DRT) for fluid administration requires an assistant. The assistant prepares syringes of fluid while the provider repeatedly selects a syringe (A), attaches it to the intravenous line and depresses the plunger (B), then disconnects and discards the empty syringe (C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A and B) The ‘push–pull’ technique (PPT) for fluid administration requires the healthcare provider to repeatedly perform two steps. With the stopcock positioned ‘off’ to the patient, the provider first pulls on the syringe plunger to fill the syringe with fluid (A). The provider must then toggle the stopcock ‘on’ to the patient and depress the plunger to administer fluid to the patient (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
CONSORT trial flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yager P, Noviski N. Shock. Pediatr Rev 2010;31:311–18 - PubMed
    1. McKiernan CA, Lieberman SA. Circulatory shock in children: an overview. Pediatri Rev 2005;26:451–60 - PubMed
    1. Management of shock. In: Chameides L, Samson RA, Schexnayder SM, Hazinski MF, eds. Pediatric advanced life support provider manual. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2011:85–108
    1. Shock. Advanced trauma life support for doctors student manual. 8th edn. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, 2008:55–71
    1. Pediatric Trauma. Advanced trauma life support for doctors student course manual. 8th edn. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, 2008:225–46

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources