Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up
- PMID: 24994619
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.008
Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up
Abstract
Objectives: This prospective clinical trial evaluated the longevity of direct resin composite (DRC) restorations made on stained dentin that is exposed upon removal of existing amalgam restorations in extensive cavities with severely reduced macro-mechanical retention for amalgam replacement.
Methods: Between January 2007 and September 2013, a total of 88 patients (57 women, 31 men; mean age: 51.6 years old) received extensive cusp replacing DRCs (n=118) in the posterior teeth. DRCs were indicated for replacement of existing amalgam restorations where dentin substrates were stained by amalgam. After employing a three-step total-etch adhesive technique (Quadrant Unibond Primer, Quadrant Unibond Sealer, Cavex), cavities were restored using a hybrid composite (Clearfil Photo Posterior, Kuraray). At baseline and thereafter every 6 months, restorations were checked upon macroscopically visible loss of anatomical contour, marginal discolouration, secondary caries, fractures, debonding and endodontic problems. Restorations were scored as failed if any operative intervention was indicated for repair, partial or total replacement.
Results: Restorations were observed for a minimum of seven, and maximum 96 months (mean: 40.3 months). In total, four failures were observed due to fracture (n=1), endodontic complications (n=2) and inadequate proximal contact (n=1). Failures were related neither to inadequate adhesion nor to secondary caries. Cumulative survival rate was 96.6% (95% CI: 89-95) up to a mean observation time of 40.3 months (Kaplan-Meier) with an annual failure rate of 0.9%.
Conclusion: In case of amalgam replacement, dentin that is exposed upon removal of existing amalgam restorations does not impair clinical longevity of extended cusp replacing direct resin composite restorations.
Clinical significance: Extensive amalgam restorations can be replaced with a variety of treatment options. This clinical study indicates that in such cases directly applied resin based composites offer a reliable and low-cost treatment option, even if dentin is stained by amalgam corrosion products.
Keywords: Adhesive dentistry; Amalgam; Clinical study; Cusp replacement; Direct composite restorations; Minimal invasive dentistry.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis.J Adhes Dent. 2012 Aug;14(5):407-31. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a28390. J Adhes Dent. 2012. PMID: 23082310
-
Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two micro-hybrid resin composites.J Dent. 2012 Sep;40(9):766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 2. J Dent. 2012. PMID: 22664565 Clinical Trial.
-
Three-year clinical evaluation of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam in endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.Oper Dent. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):599-604. doi: 10.2341/10-064-C. Oper Dent. 2010. PMID: 21179997 Clinical Trial.
-
[Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 2008;63(4):135-46. Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 2008. PMID: 19227687 Review. French.
-
Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e195-e203. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12630. Epub 2017 May 17. J Prosthodont. 2019. PMID: 28513897 Review.
Cited by
-
Microtensile Bond Strength Evaluation of Composite Resin to Discolored Dentin After Amalgam Removal.Cureus. 2020 Apr 4;12(4):e7536. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7536. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 32377484 Free PMC article.
-
The Effects of Amalgam Contamination and Different Surface Modifications on Dentin Shear Bond Strength When Using Different Adhesive Protocols.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021 May 27;13:211-221. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S307545. eCollection 2021. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021. PMID: 34079382 Free PMC article.
-
Amalgam phase down: baseline data preceding implementation in Nigeria.Int Dent J. 2020 Jun;70(3):161-166. doi: 10.1111/idj.12536. Epub 2019 Dec 6. Int Dent J. 2020. PMID: 31811657 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Matrix Type on Marginal Gap Formation of Deep Class II Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;19(9):4961. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094961. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35564356 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Innovative Nanostructured Fillers for Dental Resins: Nanoporous Alumina and Titania Nanotubes.Biomedicines. 2023 Jul 7;11(7):1926. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11071926. Biomedicines. 2023. PMID: 37509565 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources