Clinical observation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
- PMID: 24995098
- PMCID: PMC4073759
Clinical observation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
Abstract
To evaluate safety, feasibility and the improvement of surgical method of laparoscopic extensive hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Clinical data were prospectively collected from patients with IA2-IIA cervical cancer who underwent laparoscopic extensive hysterectomy (n1=22) and laparotomy (n2=23) in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in the Subei People's Hospital from June 2010 to August 2013. The successful rates in two groups of operation were 100%. Blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, complication rate, postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal tract and bladder function of the laparoscopy group of the laparoscopic group were all better than those of the laparotomy group, and there were significant differences (all P < 0.05). But in the laparoscopy group, the operative time was longer than the laparotomy group with statistical significance (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of excised lymph nodes and the duration time of postoperative urinary catheterization between the two groups (P > 0.05). Laparoscopic extensive hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection can fully meet the requirement of laparotomy. It has the properties of minor trauma and rapid recovery. The clinical efficacy is superior to laparotomy surgery. The results indicated laparoscopic is an ideal method for the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Keywords: Laparoscopic surgery; cervical cancer; clinical efficacy.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):531-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.04.015. Epub 2008 Jul 26. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18657483
-
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015. PMID: 26887872 Chinese.
-
[Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 25;55(9):609-616. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200727-00612. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32957749 Chinese.
-
Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jun 7. Gynecol Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22683586 Review.
-
Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Mar-Apr;26(3):417-426.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 22. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30359783
Cited by
-
Digital Immune-Related Gene Expression Signatures In High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: Developing Prediction Models For Platinum Response.Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Nov 12;11:9571-9583. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S219872. eCollection 2019. Cancer Manag Res. 2019. PMID: 31814759 Free PMC article.
-
Raloxifene suppress proliferation-promoting function of estrogen in CaSKi cervical cells.Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Apr 15;8(4):5571-5. eCollection 2015. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015. PMID: 26131140 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253143. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34197466 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis comparing open and minimally invasive cervical tumor surgery wound infection and postoperative complications.BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02713-8. BMC Surg. 2024. PMID: 39710635 Free PMC article.
-
Knockdown of TRIM11 suppresses cell progression and apoptosis of cervical cancer cells via PI3K/AKT pathway.Am J Transl Res. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):10328-10340. eCollection 2021. Am J Transl Res. 2021. PMID: 34650700 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer. 2001;94:153–156. - PubMed
-
- Lu CH, Sheng XG. Research progress of cervical carcinoma associated stem cells. Chin J Cancer Prevtreat. 2013;20:317–320.
-
- Kehoe S. Treatments for gynaecological cancers. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2006;20:985–1000. - PubMed
-
- Webb MJ. Radical hysterectomy. Bailliere’s Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;11:149–166. - PubMed
-
- Sobiczewski P, Bidzinski M, Derlatka P. Early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy and conventional surgery: comparison of treatment results. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:1390–1395. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources