Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Aug;42(8):902-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

Cost-effectiveness of silicone and alginate impressions for complete dentures

C Hulme  1 , G Yu  1 , C Browne  1 , J O'Dwyer  1 , H Craddock  2 , S Brown  3 , J Gray  3 , S Pavitt  4 , C Fernandez  3 , M Godfrey  4 , G Dukanovic  5 , P Brunton  6 , T P Hyde  7
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost-effectiveness of silicone and alginate impressions for complete dentures

C Hulme et al. J Dent. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of silicone and alginate impressions for complete dentures.

Methods: Cost effectiveness analyses were undertaken alongside a UK single centre, double blind, controlled, crossover clinical trial. Taking the perspective of the healthcare sector, effectiveness is measured using the EuroQol (EQ-5D-3L) which provides a single index value for health status that may be combined with time to produce quality adjusted life years (QALYs); and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-EDENT). Incremental cost effectiveness ratios are presented representing the additional cost per one unit gained.

Results: Mean cost was higher in the silicone impression group (£388.57 vs. £363.18). Negligible between-group differences were observed in QALY gains; the silicone group had greater mean OHIP-EDENT gains. The additional cost using silicone was £3.41 per change of one point in the OHIP-EDENT.

Conclusions: The silicone group was more costly, driven by the cost of materials. Changes in the EQ-5D and QALY gains over time and between arms were not statistically significant. Change in OHIP-EDENT score showed greater improvement in the silicone group and the difference between arms was statistically significant. Given negligible QALY gains and low level of resource use, results must be treated with caution. It is difficult to make robust claims about the comparative cost-effectiveness.

Clinical significance: Silicone impressions for complete dentures improve patients' quality of life (OHIP-EDENT score). The extra cost of silicone impressions is £30 per patient. Dentists, patients and health care funders need to consider the clinical and financial value of silicone impressions. Different patients, different dentists, different health funders will have individual perceptions and judgements. ISRCTN01528038. NIHR-RfPB grant PB-PG-0408-16300. This article forms part of a project for which the author (TPH) won the Senior Clinical Unilever Hatton Award of the International Assocation for Dental Research, Capetown, South Africa, June 2014.

Keywords: Cost; Cost effectiveness; Impression materials; Prosthodontics; Quality-of life; Resource.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fuller E., Steele J., Watt R., Nuttall N. 2009. Oral health and function—a report from the Adult Dental Health Survey.
    1. Petropoulos V.C., Rashedi B. Current concepts and techniques in complete denture final impression procedures. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2003;12:280–287. - PubMed
    1. Hyde T.P., McCord J.F. Survey of prosthodontic impression procedures for complete dentures in general dental practice in the United Kingdom. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1999;81:295–299. - PubMed
    1. Petrie C.S., Walker M.P., Williams K. A survey of US prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2005;14:253–262. - PubMed
    1. Carlsson G.E. Facts and fallacies: an evidence base for complete dentures. Dental Update. 2006;33:134. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data