Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 3;6(3):1408-40.
doi: 10.3390/cancers6031408.

STAT3 in Cancer-Friend or Foe?

Affiliations

STAT3 in Cancer-Friend or Foe?

Hai-Feng Zhang et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

The roles and significance of STAT3 in cancer biology have been extensively studied for more than a decade. Mounting evidence has shown that constitutive activation of STAT3 is a frequent biochemical aberrancy in cancer cells, and this abnormality directly contributes to tumorigenesis and shapes many malignant phenotypes in cancer cells. Nevertheless, results from more recent experimental and clinicopathologic studies have suggested that STAT3 also can exert tumor suppressor effects under specific conditions. Importantly, some of these studies have demonstrated that STAT3 can function either as an oncoprotein or a tumor suppressor in the same cell type, depending on the specific genetic background or presence/absence of specific coexisting biochemical defects. Thus, in the context of cancer biology, STAT3 can be a friend or foe. In the first half of this review, we will highlight the "evil" features of STAT3 by summarizing its oncogenic functions and mechanisms. The differences between the canonical and non-canonical pathway will be highlighted. In the second half, we will summarize the evidence supporting that STAT3 can function as a tumor suppressor. To explain how STAT3 may mediate its tumor suppressor effects, we will discuss several possible mechanisms, one of which is linked to the role of STAT3β, one of the two STAT3 splicing isoforms. Taken together, it is clear that the roles of STAT3 in cancer are multi-faceted and far more complicated than one appreciated previously. The new knowledge has provided us with new approaches and strategies when we evaluate STAT3 as a prognostic biomarker or therapeutic target.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The upstream and downstream mechanisms underlying the pathobiological function of constitutively active STAT3 in cancer. Abbreviations: Ac, acetylation; ND: N-terminal domain; FA, focal adhesion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The genetic background determines whether STAT3 is oncogenic or tumor suppressive.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A schematic diagram showing the generation of STAT3α and STAT3β from primary STAT3 mRNA by alternative splicing, and the modification sites and somatic mutation sites in STAT3 that are relevant to cancer. Abbreviations: ND, N-terminal domain; SH2, Src homology 2; TAD, transactivation domain; Me3, trimethylation; mut, mutation; Phospho, phosphorylation; Ac, acetylation.

References

    1. Yu H., Kortylewski M., Pardoll D. Crosstalk between cancer and immune cells: Role of STAT3 in the tumour microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:41–51. doi: 10.1038/nri1995. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu H., Jove R. The stats of cancer—New molecular targets come of age. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004;4:97–105. doi: 10.1038/nrc1275. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yue P., Turkson J. Targeting STAT3 in cancer: How successful are we? Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2009;18:45–56. doi: 10.1517/13543780802565791. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pensa S., Regis G., Boselli D., Novelli F., Poli V. Stat1 and STAT3 in Tumorigenesis: Two Sides of the Same Coin? Landes Bioscience; Austin, TX, USA: 2009.
    1. Sellier H., Rebillard A., Guette C., Barre B., Coqueret O. How should we define STAT3 as an oncogene and as a potential target for therapy? JAK-STAT. 2013;2:e24716. doi: 10.4161/jkst.24716. - DOI - PMC - PubMed