Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Jul 4;2014(7):CD004734.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004734.pub4.

Aspirin and/or heparin for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage with or without inherited thrombophilia

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Aspirin and/or heparin for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage with or without inherited thrombophilia

Paulien G de Jong et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Since hypercoagulability might result in recurrent miscarriage, anticoagulant agents could potentially increase the chance of live birth in subsequent pregnancies in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, with or without inherited thrombophilia.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant agents, such as aspirin and heparin, in women with a history of at least two unexplained miscarriages with or without inherited thrombophilia.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (1 October 2013) and scanned bibliographies of all located articles for any unidentified articles.

Selection criteria: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that assessed the effect of anticoagulant treatment on live birth in women with a history of at least two unexplained miscarriages with or without inherited thrombophilia were eligible. Interventions included aspirin, unfractionated heparin (UFH), and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for the prevention of miscarriage. One treatment could be compared with another or with no-treatment (or placebo).

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors (PJ and SK) assessed the studies for inclusion in the review and extracted the data. If necessary they contacted study authors for more information. We double checked the data.

Main results: Nine studies, including data of 1228 women, were included in the review evaluating the effect of either LMWH (enoxaparin or nadroparin in varying doses) or aspirin or a combination of both, on the chance of live birth in women with recurrent miscarriage, with or without inherited thrombophilia. Studies were heterogeneous with regard to study design and treatment regimen and three studies were considered to be at high risk of bias. Two of these three studies at high risk of bias showed a benefit of one treatment over the other, but in sensitivity analyses (in which studies at high risk of bias were excluded) anticoagulants did not have a beneficial effect on live birth, regardless of which anticoagulant was evaluated (risk ratio (RR) for live birth in women who received aspirin compared to placebo 0.94, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.11, n = 256), in women who received LMWH compared to aspirin RR 1.08 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.26, n = 239), and in women who received LMWH and aspirin compared to no-treatment RR 1.01 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.16) n = 322).Obstetric complications such as preterm delivery, pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction and congenital malformations were not significantly affected by any treatment regimen. In included studies, aspirin did not increase the risk of bleeding, but treatment with LWMH and aspirin increased the risk of bleeding significantly in one study. Local skin reactions (pain, itching, swelling) to injection of LMWH were reported in almost 40% of patients in the same study.

Authors' conclusions: There is a limited number of studies on the efficacy and safety of aspirin and heparin in women with a history of at least two unexplained miscarriages with or without inherited thrombophilia. Of the nine reviewed studies quality varied, different treatments were studied and of the studies at low risk of bias only one was placebo-controlled. No beneficial effect of anticoagulants in studies at low risk of bias was found. Therefore, this review does not support the use of anticoagulants in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. The effect of anticoagulants in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage and inherited thrombophilia needs to be assessed in further randomised controlled trials; at present there is no evidence of a beneficial effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Kaandorp, Dr Goddijn, and Dr Middeldorp were investigators of the randomised controlled trial ALIFE study (Kaandorp 2010). Dr Middeldorp has also been and is involved in phase 2 and phase 3 trials that assess the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant drugs for the indication of venous thrombosis or superficial thrombophlebitis. These trials were, or are being, sponsored by various pharmaceutical companies.

Figures

1
1
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Live birth.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 2 Preterm delivery < 37 weeks.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 3 Preterm delivery 24‐28 weeks.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 4 Preterm delivery 28‐32 weeks.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 5 Preterm delivery 32‐37 weeks.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 6 Obstetric complications; pre‐eclampsia.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 7 Obstetric complications; IUGR.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 8 Congenital malformations.
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 9 Side effects; any bleeding.
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 10 HIT/thrombocytopenia.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 LMWH versus aspirin, Outcome 1 Live birth.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 LMWH versus aspirin, Outcome 2 Preterm delivery < 37 weeks.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 LMWH versus aspirin, Outcome 3 Preterm delivery 24‐28 weeks.
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 LMWH versus aspirin, Outcome 4 Preterm delivery 28‐32 weeks.
2.5
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2 LMWH versus aspirin, Outcome 5 Preterm delivery 32‐37 weeks.
2.6
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2 LMWH versus aspirin, Outcome 6 Obstetric complications; pre‐eclampsia.
2.7
2.7. Analysis
Comparison 2 LMWH versus aspirin, Outcome 7 Obstetric complications; IUGR.
2.8
2.8. Analysis
Comparison 2 LMWH versus aspirin, Outcome 8 Obstetric complications; congenital malformations.
2.9
2.9. Analysis
Comparison 2 LMWH versus aspirin, Outcome 9 Side effects; any bleeding.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 LMWH versus aspirin including studies at high risk of bias, Outcome 1 Live birth.
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 LMWH versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Live birth.
5.1
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5 LMWH versus no treatment including studies at high risk of bias, Outcome 1 Live birth.
5.2
5.2. Analysis
Comparison 5 LMWH versus no treatment including studies at high risk of bias, Outcome 2 Preterm delivery < 37 weeks.
5.3
5.3. Analysis
Comparison 5 LMWH versus no treatment including studies at high risk of bias, Outcome 3 Obstetric complications; pre‐eclampsia.
5.4
5.4. Analysis
Comparison 5 LMWH versus no treatment including studies at high risk of bias, Outcome 4 Obstetric complications; IUGR.
5.5
5.5. Analysis
Comparison 5 LMWH versus no treatment including studies at high risk of bias, Outcome 5 Obstetric complications; congenital malformations.
5.6
5.6. Analysis
Comparison 5 LMWH versus no treatment including studies at high risk of bias, Outcome 6 Side effects; any bleeding.
5.7
5.7. Analysis
Comparison 5 LMWH versus no treatment including studies at high risk of bias, Outcome 7 Thromboembolic complications.
6.1
6.1. Analysis
Comparison 6 LMWH and aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Live birth.
6.2
6.2. Analysis
Comparison 6 LMWH and aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 2 Preterm delivery < 37 weeks.
6.3
6.3. Analysis
Comparison 6 LMWH and aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 3 Preterm delivery 24‐28 weeks.
6.4
6.4. Analysis
Comparison 6 LMWH and aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 4 Preterm delivery 28‐32 weeks.
6.5
6.5. Analysis
Comparison 6 LMWH and aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 5 Preterm delivery 32‐37 weeks.
6.6
6.6. Analysis
Comparison 6 LMWH and aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 6 Obstetric complications; pre‐eclampsia.
6.7
6.7. Analysis
Comparison 6 LMWH and aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 7 Obstetric complications; IUGR.
6.8
6.8. Analysis
Comparison 6 LMWH and aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 8 Congenital Malformations.
6.9
6.9. Analysis
Comparison 6 LMWH and aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 9 Side effects; any bleeding.
6.10
6.10. Analysis
Comparison 6 LMWH and aspirin versus no treatment, Outcome 10 Side effects; pain/itching/swelling at injection site.
7.1
7.1. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 1 Live birth.
7.2
7.2. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 2 Preterm delivery < 37 weeks.
7.3
7.3. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 3 Preterm delivery 24‐28 weeks.
7.4
7.4. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 4 Preterm delivery; 28‐32 weeks.
7.5
7.5. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 5 Preterm delivery; 32‐37 weeks.
7.6
7.6. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 6 Obstetric complications; pre‐eclampsia.
7.7
7.7. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 7 Obstetric complications; IUGR.
7.8
7.8. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 8 Congenital malformations.
7.9
7.9. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 9 Side effects; any bleeding.
7.10
7.10. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 10 Side effects; pain/itching/swelling at injection site.
7.11
7.11. Analysis
Comparison 7 LMWH and aspirin versus aspirin, Outcome 11 HIT/thrombocytopenia.
8.1
8.1. Analysis
Comparison 8 LMWH and aspirin versus LMWH, Outcome 1 Live birth.
8.2
8.2. Analysis
Comparison 8 LMWH and aspirin versus LMWH, Outcome 2 Preterm delivery < 37 weeks.
8.3
8.3. Analysis
Comparison 8 LMWH and aspirin versus LMWH, Outcome 3 Obstetric complications; pre‐eclampsia.
8.4
8.4. Analysis
Comparison 8 LMWH and aspirin versus LMWH, Outcome 4 Obstetric complications; IUGR.
8.5
8.5. Analysis
Comparison 8 LMWH and aspirin versus LMWH, Outcome 5 Congenital malformations.
8.6
8.6. Analysis
Comparison 8 LMWH and aspirin versus LMWH, Outcome 6 Side effects; any bleeding.
9.1
9.1. Analysis
Comparison 9 LMWH with or without aspirin vs no treatment including studies at high risk of bias, Outcome 1 Live birth.
10.1
10.1. Analysis
Comparison 10 LMWH with or without aspirin vs no treatment, Outcome 1 Live birth.

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Badawy 2008 {published data only}
    1. Badawy AM, Khiary M, Sherif LS, Hassan M, Ragab A, Abdelall I. Low‐molecular weight heparin in patients with recurrent early miscarriages of unknown aetiology. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008;28(3):280‐4. - PubMed
Clark 2010 {published data only}
    1. Clark P. The Scottish pregnancy intervention study: the effect of low molecular weight heparin and aspirin therapy on recurrent pregnancy loss (ongoing trial). National Research Register (www.nrr.nhs.uk) (accessed 6 July 2006).
    1. Clark P, Walker ID, Langhorne P, Crichton L, Thomson A, Greaves M, et al. SPIN (Scottish Pregnancy Intervention) study: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of low‐molecular‐weight heparin and low‐dose aspirin in women with recurrent miscarriage. Blood 2010;115(21):4162‐7. - PubMed
Dolitzky 2006 {published data only}
    1. Dolitzky M, Inbal A, Segal Y, Weiss A, Brenner B, Carp H. A randomized study of thromboprophylaxis in women with unexplained consecutive recurrent miscarriages. Fertility and Sterility 2006;86(2):362‐6. - PubMed
Fawzy 2008 {published data only}
    1. Fawzy M, Shokeir T, El‐Tatongy M, Warda O, El‐Refaiey AA, Mosbah A. Treatment options and pregnancy outcome in women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage: a randomized placebo‐controlled study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2008;278(1):33‐8. - PubMed
Giancotti 2012 {published data only}
    1. Chistolini A, Torelli F, Giancotti A, Pignoloni P, Muto B, Cosimo C, et al. Recurrent fetal loss: prospective evaluation of the efficacy of three different thromboprophylaxis regimens: aspirin versus low molecular weight heparin versus low molecular weight heparin plus aspirin [abstract]. Hematology Journal 2006;91(Suppl 1):146.
    1. Giancotti A, Torre RL, Spagnuolo A, D'Ambrosio V, Cerekja A, Piazze J, et al. Efficacy of three different antithrombotic regimens on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women affected by recurrent pregnancy loss. Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2012;25(7):1191‐4. [PUBMED: 21988715] - PubMed
Kaandorp 2010 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
    1. Kaandorp SP, Goddijn M, Post JA, Hutten BA, Verhoeve HR, Hamulyak K, et al. Aspirin plus heparin or aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage. New England Journal of Medicine 2010;362(17):1586‐96. - PubMed
    1. Middeldorp S. Aspirin and/or low molecular weight heparin for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage and/or intra‐uterine fetal death. Netherlands Trial Register (http://www.trialregister.nl) (accessed 1 November 2005).
Martinelli 2012 {published data only}
    1. Martinelli I. Low molecular weight heparin in pregnant women with previous obstetrical complications. A multicenter, randomized trial. Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis 2010;37 Suppl 1:A3.
    1. Martinelli I, Ruggenenti P, Cetin I, Pardi G, Perna A, Vergani P, et al. Heparin in pregnant women with previous placenta‐mediated pregnancy complications: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Blood 2012;119(14):3269‐75. [PUBMED: 22289887] - PMC - PubMed
Tulppala 1997 {published data only}
    1. Tulppala M, Marttunen M, Soderstrom‐Anttila V, Ailus K, Palosuo T, Ylikorkala O. Low dose aspirin in the prevention of miscarriage in women with unexplained or autoimmune related recurrent miscarriage: effect on prostacyclin and thromboxane A2 production. Human Reproduction 1997;12(1):191. - PubMed
    1. Tulppala M, Marttunen M, Soderstrom‐Anttila V, Foudila T, Ailus K, Palosuo T, et al. Low‐dose aspirin in the prevention of miscarriage in women with unexplained or autoimmune related recurrent miscarriage: effect on prostacyclin and thromboxane A2 production. Human Reproduction 1997;12(7):1567‐72. - PubMed
Visser 2011 {published data only}
    1. Visser J, Ulander V, Bloemenkamp K, Kaaja R. A randomised controlled multicenter study: the effect of enoxaparin and/or aspirin on prevention of recurrent miscarriage in women with or without thrombophilia, HABENOX‐study. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2009;107(Suppl 2):S371.
    1. Visser J, Ulander V‐M, Helmerhorst FM, Lampinen K, Morin‐Papunen L, Bloemenkamp KWM, et al. Thromboprophylaxis for recurrent miscarriage in women with or without thrombophilia ‐ HABENOX*: a randomised multicentre trial. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2011;105(2):295‐301. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Bar 2000 {published data only}
    1. Bar J, Cohen‐Sacher B, Hod M, Blickstein D, Lahav J, Merlob P. Low‐molecular‐weight heparin for thrombophilia in pregnant women. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2000;69:209‐13. - PubMed
Bar 2001 {published data only}
    1. Bar J, Mashiah R, Cohen‐Sacher B, Hod M, Orvieto R, Ben‐Rafael Z, et al. Effect of thromboprophylaxis on uterine and fetal circulation in pregnant women with a history of pregnancy complications. Thrombosis Research 2001;101:235‐41. - PubMed
Bick 2000 {published data only}
    1. Bick RL. Recurrent miscarriage syndrome due to blood coagulation protein/platelet defects: prevalence, treatment and outcome results. DRW Metroplex Recurrent Miscarriage Syndrome Cooperative Group. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis 2000;6(3):115‐25. - PubMed
Brenner 2000 {published data only}
    1. Brenner B, Hoffman, Blumenfeld Z, Weiner Z, Younis JS. Gestational outcome in thrombophilic women with recurrent pregnancy loss treated by enoxaparin. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2000;83:693‐7. - PubMed
Brenner 2005 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Brenner B, Bar J, Ellis M, Yarom I, Yohai D, Samueloff A. Effects of enoxaparin on late pregnancy complications and neonatal outcome in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and thrombophilia: results from the Live‐Enox study. Fertility and Sterility 2005;84(3):770‐3. - PubMed
    1. Brenner B, Hoffman R, Carp H, Dulitsky M, Samueloff A, Yohai D, et al. Enoxaparin treatment improves the gestational outcome of pregnant women with thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss: the LIVE‐ENOX study [abstract]. Blood 2003;102(11):16a.
    1. Brenner B, Hoffman R, Carp H, Dulitsky M, Samueloff A, Yohal D, et al. Efficacy and safety of two doses of enoxaparin in pregnant women with thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss: the LIVE‐ENOX study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2003;1 Suppl 1:Abstract number: OC084. - PubMed
    1. Brenner B, Hoffman R, Carp H, Dulitsky M, Younis J. Efficacy and safety of two doses of enoxaparin in women with thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss: the LIVE‐ENOX study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2005;3(2):227‐9. - PubMed
    1. Brenner B, for the LIVE‐ENOX Investigators. Efficacy and safety of two doses of enoxaparin in pregnant women with thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss. The LIVE‐ENOX study. Blood 2002;100(11 Pt 1):702a. - PubMed
Carp 2003 {published data only}
    1. Carp H, Dolitzky M, Inbal A. Thromboprophylaxis improves the live birth rate in women with consecutive recurrent miscarriages and hereditary thrombophilia. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2003;1:433‐8. - PubMed
Grandone 2002 {published data only}
    1. Grandone E, Brancaccio V, Colaizzo D, Sciannamé N, Pavone G, Minno G, et al. Preventing adverse obstetric outcomes in women with genetic thrombophilia. Fertility and Sterility 2002;78(2):371‐5. - PubMed
Gris 1995 {published data only}
    1. Gris JC, Neveu S, Tailland ML, Courtieu C, Mares P, Schved JF. Use of a low‐molecular‐weight heparin (enoxaparin) or of a phenformin‐like substance (moroxydine chloride) in primary early recurrent aborters with an impaired fibrinolytic capacity. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 1995;73(3):362‐7. - PubMed
Gris 2004 {published data only}
    1. Gris JC, Mercier E, Quéré I, Lavigne‐Lissalde G, Cochery‐Nouvellon E, Hoffet M, et al. Low‐molecular‐weight heparin versus low‐dose aspirin in women with one fetal loss and a constitutional thrombophilic disorder. Blood 2004;103:3695‐9. - PubMed
Gris 2010 {published data only}
    1. Gris JC, Chauleur C, Faillie JL, Baer G, Mares P, Fabbro‐Peray P, et al. Enoxaparin for the secondary prevention of placental vascular complications in women with abruptio placentae: the pilot randomised controlled NOH‐AP trial. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2010; Vol. 104, issue 4:771‐9. - PubMed
Gris 2011 {published data only}
    1. Gris JC, Chauleur C, Molinari N, Mares P, Fabbro‐Peray P, Quere I, et al. Addition of enoxaparin to aspirin for the secondary prevention of placental vascular complications in women with severe pre‐eclampsia. The pilot randomised controlled NOH‐PE trial. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2011;106(6):1053‐61. [PUBMED: 21946915] - PubMed
Li 2003 {published data only}
    1. Li DK, Liu L, Odouli R. Exposure to non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: population based cohort study. BMJ 2003;327:368‐72. - PMC - PubMed
Ogasawara 2001 {published data only}
    1. Ogasawara MS, Iinuma Y, Aoki K, Katano K, Ozaki Y, Suzumori K. Low‐dose aspirin is effective for treatment of recurrent miscarriage in patients with decreased coagulation factor XII. Fertility and Sterility 2001;76(1):203‐4. - PubMed
Rai 2000 {published data only}
    1. Rai R, Backos M, Baxter N, Chilcott I, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage‐an aspirin a day?. Human Reproduction 2000;15(10):2220‐3. - PubMed
Rey 2009 {published data only}
    1. Rey E, Garneau P, David M, Gauthier R, Leduc L, Michon N, et al. Dalteparin for the prevention of recurrence of placental‐mediated complications of pregnancy in women without thrombophilia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2009;7(1):58‐64. - PubMed
Reznikoff‐Etievant 1999 {published data only}
    1. Reznikoff‐Etievant MF, Cayol V, Zou GM, Abuaf N, Robert A, Johanet C, et al. Habitual abortions in 678 healthy patients: investigation and prevention. Human Reproduction 1999;14(8):2106‐9. - PubMed
Sarig 2003 {published data only}
    1. Sarig G, Aharon A, Lanir N, Goshen H, Drugan A, Blumenfeld Z, et al. Modulation of systemic and placental hemostatic mechanisms by enoxaparin in women with gestational vascular complications. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2003;1 Suppl 1:Abstract number: OC083.
Sarto 2001 {published data only}
    1. Sarto A, Rocha M, Geller M, Capmany C, Martinez M, Quintans C, et al. Treatment with enoxaparin adapted to the fertility programs in women with recurrent abortion and thrombophilia. Medicina 2001;61(4):406‐12. - PubMed
Sorensen 2000 {published data only}
    1. Sorensen HT, Johnsen SP, Larsen H, Pedersen L, Nielsen GL, Moller M. Birth outcomes in pregnant women treated with low‐molecular‐weight heparin. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2000;79:655‐9. - PubMed
Tzafettas 2002 {published data only}
    1. Tzafettas J, Mamopoulos A, Anapliotis A, Loufopoulos A, Psarra A, Klearchou N, et al. Thromboprophylaxis throughout pregnancy in women with previous history of recurrent miscarriage of unknown etiology. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002;29(4):267‐70. - PubMed
Younis 2000 {published data only}
    1. Younis JS, Ohel G, Brenner B, Haddad S, Lanir N, Ben‐Ami M. The effect of thromboprophylaxis on pregnancy outcome in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss associated with factor V mutation. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2000;107:415‐9. - PubMed
Zolghadri 2010 {published data only}
    1. Zolghadri J, Ahmadpour F, Momtahan M, Tavana Z, Foroughinia L. Evaluation of the efficacy of aspirin and low molecular weight heparin in patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 2010;12(5):548‐52.

References to studies awaiting assessment

Rodger 2009 {published data only}
    1. Abou‐Nassar K, Kovacs MJ, Kahn SR, Wells P, Doucette S, Ramsay T, et al. The effect of dalteparin on coagulation activation during pregnancy in women with thrombophilia. A randomized trial. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2007;98(1):163‐71. - PubMed
    1. Abou‐Nassar K, Rodger M, Kovacs MJ, Doucette S, Tim R, Kahn S, et al. The effect of dalteparin on coagulation activation during pregnancy in women with thrombophilia: a randomised trial. Blood 2006;108(11 Pt 1):262. - PubMed
    1. Rodger M, Hague WM, Kingdom J, Kahn SR, Karovitch A, Wells PS, et al. The Thrombophilia in Pregnancy Prophylaxis Study (TIPPS): a multi‐national randomized trial of dalteparin vs. no dalteparin to prevent pregnancy complications in pregnant thrombophilic women. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2013;11(Suppl 2):78.
    1. Rodger MA. TIPPS: Thrombophilia in pregnancy prophylaxis study. ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed 21 May 2013). NCT00967382 2009.
    1. Rodger MA, Kahn S, Cranney A, Hodson A, Kovacs M, Clement AM, et al. Prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during pregnancy is not associated with a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) [abstract]. Hypertension in Pregnancy 2006;25(Suppl 1):8.
Salman 2012 {published data only}
    1. Salman SA, Shaaban OM, Zahran KM, Fathalla MM, Anan MA. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of recurrent miscarriage negatively tested for anti phospholipid antibodies: A randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility 2012;98(3 Suppl 1):S191.
Schleussner 2013 {published data only}
    1. Kamin G, Rogenhofer N, Pildner V, Steinberg S, Neuhoffer A, Seeger S, et al. Therapy with dalteparin for habitual abortion ‐ presentation of the ETHiG II‐Studie [Therapie mit Dalteparin bei habitueller Abortneigung ‐ Vorstellung der ETHiG II‐Studie]. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 2008;68:S51.
    1. Schleussner E. Effectiveness of dalteparin therapy as intervention in recurrent pregnancy loss. http://controlled‐trials.com (accessed 15.02.2007).
    1. Schleussner E, Bohlmann M, Kamin G, Rogenhofer N, Seeger S, Toth B. Low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of habitual abortion ‐ introduction of the multicentre study EThIG2 and discussion of the current data [Niedermolekulares heparin zur pravention habitueller aborte ‐ vorstellung der multizentrischen EThIG2‐studie und diskussion der aktuellen datenlage]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2012;286(Suppl 1):S220.
    1. Schleussner E, Kamin G, Seeliger G, Rogenhofer N, Toth B. Low‐molecular‐weight heparin in recurrent pregnancy loss‐Results of the ETHIG II study. Thrombosis Research 2013;131(Suppl 1):S73.

Additional references

Askie 2007
    1. Askie LM, Duley L, Henderson‐Smart DJ, Stewart LA. Antiplatelet agents for prevention of pre‐eclampsia: a meta‐analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2007;369(9575):1791‐8. [PUBMED: 17512048] - PubMed
Bates 2012
    1. Bates SM, Greer IA, Middeldorp S, Veenstra DL, Prabulos AM, Vandvik PO. VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence‐Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141(2 Suppl):e691S‐736S. [PUBMED: 22315276] - PMC - PubMed
Bhattacharya 2010
    1. Bhattacharya S, Townend J, Bhattacharya S. Recurrent miscarriage: Are three miscarriages one too many? Analysis of a Scottish population‐based database of 151,021 pregnancies. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2010;150(1):24‐7. [PUBMED: 20207064] - PubMed
Braekeleer 1990
    1. Braekeleer M, Dao TN. Cytogenetic studies in couples experiencing repeated pregnancy losses. Human Reproduction 1990;5:519‐28. - PubMed
Brigham 1999
    1. Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Human Reproduction 1999;14:2868‐71. - PubMed
Chan 2011
    1. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine‐Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high‐risk populations: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update 2011;17(6):761‐71. [PUBMED: 21705770] - PMC - PubMed
Christiansen 2005
    1. Christiansen OB, Nybo Andersen AM, Bosch E, Daya S, Delves PJ, Hviid TV, et al. Evidence‐based investigations and treatments of recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertility and Sterility 2005;83(4):821‐39. - PubMed
Christiansen 2006
    1. Christiansen OB. Evidence‐based investigations and treatments of recurrent pregnancy loss. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006;18:304‐12. - PubMed
Clifford 1994
    1. Clifford K, Rai R, Watson H, Regan L. An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary experience of 500 consecutive cases. Human Reproduction 1994;9:1328‐32. - PubMed
Cohn 2010
    1. Cohn DM, Goddijn M, Middeldorp S, Korevaar JC, Dawood F, Farquharson RG. Recurrent miscarriage and antiphospholipid antibodies: prognosis of subsequent pregnancy. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2010;8(10):2208‐13. [PUBMED: 20704646] - PMC - PubMed
Cook 1995
    1. Cook CL, Pridman DD. Recurrent pregnancy loss. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995;7:357‐66. - PubMed
Dizon 1997
    1. Dizon TD, Meline L, Nelson LM, Varner M, Ward K. Fetal carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation are prone to miscarriage and placental infarction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;177:402‐5. - PubMed
Empson 2005
    1. Empson M, Lassere M, Craig J, Scott J. Prevention of recurrent miscarriage for women with antiphospholipid antibody or lupus anticoagulant. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002859.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Everett 1997
    1. Everett C. Incidence and outcome of bleeding before the 20th week of pregnancy: prospective study from general practice. BMJ 1997;315:32‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Farquharson 2002
    1. Farquharson RG, Quenby S, Greaves M. Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial of treatment. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;100:408‐13. - PubMed
Franssen 2005
    1. Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, Knegt AC, Gerssen‐Schoorl KB, et al. Selective chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: case‐control study. BMJ 2005;331:137‐41. - PMC - PubMed
Ginsberg 2001
    1. Ginsberg JS, Greer I, Hirsh J. Use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy. Chest 2001;119(Suppl):122‐31. - PubMed
Goyaux 2001
    1. Goyaux N, Alihonou E, Diadhiou F, Leke R, Thonneau PF. Complications of induced abortion and miscarriage in three African Countries: a hospital‐based study among WHO collaborating centres. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2001;80:568‐73. - PubMed
Haas 2008
    1. Haas DM, Ramsey PS. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003511.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Huisjes 1984
    1. Huisjes HJ. Spontaneous Abortion. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1984:6.
Infante‐Reviard 1991
    1. Infante‐Reviard C, David M, Gauthier R, Rivard GE. Lupus anticoagulants, anticardiolipin antibodies, and fetal loss. A case‐control study. New England Journal of Medicine 1991;325:1063‐6. - PubMed
Jaslow 2010
    1. Jaslow CR, Carney JL, Kutteh WH. Diagnostic factors identified in 1020 women with two versus three or more recurrent pregnancy losses. Fertility and Sterility 2010;93(4):1234‐43. [PUBMED: 19338986] - PubMed
Jauniaux 2006
    1. Jauniaux E, Farquharson RG, Christiansen OB, Exalto N. Evidence‐based guidelines for the investigation and medical treatment of recurrent miscarriage. Human Reproduction 2006;21:2216‐22. - PubMed
Kupferminc 1999
    1. Kupferminc MJ, Eldor A, Steinman N, Many A, Bar‐Am A, Jaffa A, et al. Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine 1999;340:9‐13. - PubMed
Kutteh 1996
    1. Kutteh WH. Antiphospholipid antibody‐associated recurrent pregnancy loss: treatment with heparin and low‐dose aspirin is superior to low‐dose aspirin alone. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;174:1584‐9. - PubMed
Laskin 2009
    1. Laskin CA, Spitzer KA, Clark CA, Crowther MR, Ginsberg JS, Hawker GA, et al. Low molecular weight heparin and aspirin for recurrent pregnancy loss: results from the randomized, controlled HepASA Trial. Journal of Rheumatology 2009;36(2):279‐87. [PUBMED: 19208560] - PubMed
Lee 1996
    1. Lee C, Slade P. Miscarriage as a traumatic event: a review of the literature and new implications for intervention. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1996;40(3):235‐44. - PubMed
Levine 2002
    1. Levine JS, Branch W, Rauch J. The antiphospholipid syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2002;346:752‐63. - PubMed
Lim 2006
    1. Lim W, Crowther MA, Eikelboom JW. Management of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: a systematic review. JAMA 2006;295(9):1050‐7. [PUBMED: 16507806] - PubMed
Lindqvist 2006
    1. Lindqvist PG, Merlo J. The natural course of women with recurrent fetal loss. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2006;4:896‐7. - PubMed
Lockshin 1999
    1. Lockshin MD. Pregnancy loss in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 1999;82:641‐8. - PubMed
Lok 2007
    1. Lok IH, Neugebauer R. Psychological morbidity following miscarriage. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2007;21(2):229‐47. [PUBMED: 17317322] - PubMed
Meinardi 1999
    1. Meinardi JR, Middeldorp S, Kam PJ, Koopman MMW, Pampus ECM, Hamulyak K, et al. Increased risk for fetal loss in carriers of the factor V Leiden. Annals of Internal Medicine 1999;130:736‐9. - PubMed
Middeldorp 2007
    1. Middeldorp S. Thrombophilia and pregnancy complications: cause or association?. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2007;5 Suppl 1:276‐82. - PubMed
Middeldorp 2007a
    1. Middeldorp S, Levi M. Thrombophilia: an update. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis 2007;33(6):563‐72. [PUBMED: 17768688] - PubMed
Miyakis 2006
    1. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2006;4(2):295‐306. [PUBMED: 16420554] - PubMed
Mousa 2000
    1. Mousa HA, Alfirevic Z. Do placental lesions reflect thrombophilia state in women with adverse pregnancy outcome?. Human Reproduction 2000;15:1830‐3. - PubMed
NHMRC 2001
    1. National Health and Medical Research Council. Report on Maternal Deaths in Australia 1994‐96. Canberra. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 2001.
Porter 2006
    1. Porter TF, LaCoursiere Y, Scott JR. Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000112.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Preston 1996
    1. Preston F, Rosendaal FR, Walker ID, Briet E, Berntorp E, Conard J, et al. Increased fetal loss in women with heritable thrombophilia. Lancet 1996;348:913‐6. - PubMed
Rai 1995
    1. Rai RS, Regan L, Clifford K, Pickering W, Dave M, Mackie I, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies and beta2‐glycoprotein‐I in 500 women with recurrent miscarriage: results of a comprehensive approach. Human Reproduction 1995;10:2001‐5. - PubMed
Rai 1996
    1. Rai RS, Regan L, Chitolie A, Donald JG, Cohen H. Placental thrombosis and second trimester miscarriage in association with activated protein C resistance. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996;103:842‐4. - PubMed
Rai 1997
    1. Rai R, Cohen H, Dave M, Regan L. Randomised controlled trial of aspirin and aspirin plus heparin in pregnant women with recurrent miscarriage associated with phospholipid antibodies (or antiphospholipid antibodies). BMJ 1997;314:253‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Regan 1988
    1. Regan L. A prospective study of spontaneous abortion. Early Pregnancy Loss: Mechanisms and Treatment. RCOG, 1988.
RevMan 2012 [Computer program]
    1. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
Rey 2003
    1. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta‐analysis. Lancet 2003;361:901‐8. - PubMed
Robertson 2006
    1. Robertson L, Wu O, Langhorne P, Twaddle S, Clark P, Lowe GD, et al. Thrombophilia in pregnancy: a systematic review. British Journal of Haematology 2006;132(2):171‐96. [PUBMED: 16398652] - PubMed
Rushton 1988
    1. Rushton DI. Placental pathology in spontaneous miscarriage. In: Beard RW, Sharp F editor(s). Early Pregnancy Loss: Mechanisms and Treatment. London: RCOG, 1988:149‐58.
Sanson 1996
    1. Sanson BJ, Friederich PW, Simioni P, Zanardi S, Huisman MV, Girolami A, et al. The risk of abortion and stillbirth in antithrombin‐, protein C‐, and protein S‐deficient women. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 1996;75(3):387‐8. - PubMed
Sanson 1999
    1. Sanson BJ, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Ginsberg JS, Barkagan ZS, Lavenne‐Pardonge E. Safety of low‐molecular‐weight heparin in pregnancy. A systematic review. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 1999;81:668‐72. - PubMed
Stirrat 1990
    1. Stirrat GM. Recurrent miscarriage: definition and epidemiology. Lancet 1990;336:673‐5. - PubMed
van den Boogaard 2010
    1. Boogaard E, Kaandorp SP, Franssen MT, Mol BW, Leschot NJ, Wouters CH, et al. Consecutive or non‐consecutive recurrent miscarriage: is there any difference in carrier status?. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 2010;25(6):1411‐4. [PUBMED: 20382970] - PubMed
van den Boogaard 2012
    1. Boogaard E, Cohn DM, Korevaar JC, Dawood F, Vissenberg R, Middeldorp S, et al. Number and sequence of preceding miscarriages and maternal age for the prediction of antiphospholipid syndrome in women with recurrent miscarriage. Fertility and Sterility 2012 Oct 6 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.002.] - DOI - PubMed
Walker 2003
    1. Walker MC, Ferguson SE, Allen VM. Heparin for pregnant women with acquired or inherited thrombophilias. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003580] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
WHO 2009
    1. Zegers‐Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 2009;24(11):2683‐7. [PUBMED: 19801627] - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Di Nisio 2005
    1. Nisio M, Peters LW, Middeldorp S. Aspirin or anticoagulants for the treatment of recurrent miscarriage in women without antiphospholipid syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004734.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Kaandorp 2009
    1. Kaandorp S, Nisio M, Goddijn M, Middeldorp S. Aspirin or anticoagulants for treating recurrent miscarriage in women without antiphospholipid syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004734.pub3] - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms