Mechanical circulatory devices in acute heart failure
- PMID: 24996610
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2014.04.002
Mechanical circulatory devices in acute heart failure
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock remains a leading cause of mortality despite advances in the treatment of myocardial infarction and advanced heart failure. Medical therapy can be inadequate, and patients may need mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The proper application of MCS requires knowledge of the underlying cause of acute heart failure, familiarity with the circulatory support devices, and the potential benefits and limitations of device therapy. This article describes the most commonly used temporary ventricular assist devices and their use in the various causes of cardiogenic shock.
Keywords: Acute heart failure; Cardiogenic shock; Mechanical circulatory support; Ventricular assist device.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Heart rescue: the role of mechanical circulatory support in the management of severe refractory cardiogenic shock.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012 Oct;18(5):409-16. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328357f1e6. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012. PMID: 22895213 Review.
-
Hemodynamic support with percutaneous devices in patients with heart failure.Heart Fail Clin. 2015 Apr;11(2):215-30. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Feb 21. Heart Fail Clin. 2015. PMID: 25834971 Review.
-
Risk assessment and comparative effectiveness of left ventricular assist device and medical management in ambulatory heart failure patients: design and rationale of the ROADMAP clinical trial.Am Heart J. 2015 Feb;169(2):205-210.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 11. Am Heart J. 2015. PMID: 25641529 Clinical Trial.
-
Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jun;26(2):131-46. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2012.05.001. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2012. PMID: 22910086 Review.
-
Circulatory assist devices in heart failure patients.Heart Fail Clin. 2009 Jan;5(1):55-62, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2008.08.002. Heart Fail Clin. 2009. PMID: 19026386 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanical Assist Device-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Use of Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as an Emerging Frontier in Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.Cureus. 2023 Jan 4;15(1):e33372. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33372. eCollection 2023 Jan. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36751242 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment strategies for patients with an INTERMACS I profile.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):4-8. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-11-1-4. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015. PMID: 25793022 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impella use in real-world cardiogenic shock patients: Sobering outcomes.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247667. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33635889 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Available Modalities and Review of Literature.Heart Views. 2020 Oct-Dec;21(4):269-275. doi: 10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_92_20. Epub 2021 Jan 14. Heart Views. 2020. PMID: 33986926 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: A Novel Approach in the Management of Patients With Acute Cardiogenic Shock.Ochsner J. 2016 Fall;16(3):243-9. Ochsner J. 2016. PMID: 27660572 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical