Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Jul 5:15:267.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-267.

Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions

Mary J De Silva et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: The Medical Research Councils' framework for complex interventions has been criticized for not including theory-driven approaches to evaluation. Although the framework does include broad guidance on the use of theory, it contains little practical guidance for implementers and there have been calls to develop a more comprehensive approach. A prospective, theory-driven process of intervention design and evaluation is required to develop complex healthcare interventions which are more likely to be effective, sustainable and scalable.

Methods: We propose a theory-driven approach to the design and evaluation of complex interventions by adapting and integrating a programmatic design and evaluation tool, Theory of Change (ToC), into the MRC framework for complex interventions. We provide a guide to what ToC is, how to construct one, and how to integrate its use into research projects seeking to design, implement and evaluate complex interventions using the MRC framework. We test this approach by using ToC within two randomized controlled trials and one non-randomized evaluation of complex interventions.

Results: Our application of ToC in three research projects has shown that ToC can strengthen key stages of the MRC framework. It can aid the development of interventions by providing a framework for enhanced stakeholder engagement and by explicitly designing an intervention that is embedded in the local context. For the feasibility and piloting stage, ToC enables the systematic identification of knowledge gaps to generate research questions that strengthen intervention design. ToC may improve the evaluation of interventions by providing a comprehensive set of indicators to evaluate all stages of the causal pathway through which an intervention achieves impact, combining evaluations of intervention effectiveness with detailed process evaluations into one theoretical framework.

Conclusions: Incorporating a ToC approach into the MRC framework holds promise for improving the design and evaluation of complex interventions, thereby increasing the likelihood that the intervention will be ultimately effective, sustainable and scalable. We urge researchers developing and evaluating complex interventions to consider using this approach, to evaluate its usefulness and to build an evidence base to further refine the methodology.

Trial registration: Clinical trials.gov: NCT02160249.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SHARE Theory of Change: peer counselling for maternal depression in Goa, India.
Figure 2
Figure 2
How Theory of Change can be used to strengthen the MRC framework. Adapted from Craig et al.[1].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J. 2008;337:a1655. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craig P, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: reflections on the 2008 MRC guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:585–587. - PubMed
    1. Anderson R. New MRC guidance on evaluating complex interventions. Br Med J. 2008;337:a1937. - PubMed
    1. Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, Lorenc T, Moore L. Realist randomized controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:2299–2306. - PubMed
    1. Ling T. Evaluating complex and unfolding interventions in real time. Evaluation. 2012;18:79–91.

Publication types

Associated data