Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions
- PMID: 24996765
- PMCID: PMC4227087
- DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-267
Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions
Abstract
Background: The Medical Research Councils' framework for complex interventions has been criticized for not including theory-driven approaches to evaluation. Although the framework does include broad guidance on the use of theory, it contains little practical guidance for implementers and there have been calls to develop a more comprehensive approach. A prospective, theory-driven process of intervention design and evaluation is required to develop complex healthcare interventions which are more likely to be effective, sustainable and scalable.
Methods: We propose a theory-driven approach to the design and evaluation of complex interventions by adapting and integrating a programmatic design and evaluation tool, Theory of Change (ToC), into the MRC framework for complex interventions. We provide a guide to what ToC is, how to construct one, and how to integrate its use into research projects seeking to design, implement and evaluate complex interventions using the MRC framework. We test this approach by using ToC within two randomized controlled trials and one non-randomized evaluation of complex interventions.
Results: Our application of ToC in three research projects has shown that ToC can strengthen key stages of the MRC framework. It can aid the development of interventions by providing a framework for enhanced stakeholder engagement and by explicitly designing an intervention that is embedded in the local context. For the feasibility and piloting stage, ToC enables the systematic identification of knowledge gaps to generate research questions that strengthen intervention design. ToC may improve the evaluation of interventions by providing a comprehensive set of indicators to evaluate all stages of the causal pathway through which an intervention achieves impact, combining evaluations of intervention effectiveness with detailed process evaluations into one theoretical framework.
Conclusions: Incorporating a ToC approach into the MRC framework holds promise for improving the design and evaluation of complex interventions, thereby increasing the likelihood that the intervention will be ultimately effective, sustainable and scalable. We urge researchers developing and evaluating complex interventions to consider using this approach, to evaluate its usefulness and to build an evidence base to further refine the methodology.
Trial registration: Clinical trials.gov: NCT02160249.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(57):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta25570. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 34590577 Free PMC article.
-
What works, for whom and under what circumstances? Using realist methodology to evaluate complex interventions in nursing: A scoping review.Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103601. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103601. Epub 2020 May 12. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020. PMID: 32590248
-
Increasing value and reducing waste by optimizing the development of complex interventions: Enriching the development phase of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework.Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 5. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018. PMID: 29220738
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Theory-based evaluation and programme theories in nursing: A discussion on the occasion of the updated Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework.Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Apr;140:104451. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104451. Epub 2023 Feb 1. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023. PMID: 36812849 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating dermatology education and training.Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022 Dec;47(12):2096-2099. doi: 10.1111/ced.15398. Epub 2022 Oct 17. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022. PMID: 36056762 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Discussing methodological gaps in psychosocial intervention research for dementia: an opinion article from the INTERDEM Methodology Taskforce guided by the MRC framework.Front Dement. 2024 Sep 26;3:1458023. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1458023. eCollection 2024. Front Dement. 2024. PMID: 39391708 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Optimizing the development and evaluation of complex interventions: lessons learned from the BetterBirth Program and associated trial.Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:29. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00014-8. eCollection 2020. Implement Sci Commun. 2020. PMID: 32885188 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a Theory of Change for a Digital Youth Mental Health Service (Moderated Online Social Therapy): Mixed Methods Knowledge Synthesis Study.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 3;7:e49846. doi: 10.2196/49846. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37921858 Free PMC article.
-
Designing integrated interventions to improve nutrition and WASH behaviors in Kenya.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Feb 3;6:10. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-0555-x. eCollection 2020. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020. PMID: 32042436 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Craig P, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: reflections on the 2008 MRC guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:585–587. - PubMed
-
- Anderson R. New MRC guidance on evaluating complex interventions. Br Med J. 2008;337:a1937. - PubMed
-
- Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, Lorenc T, Moore L. Realist randomized controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:2299–2306. - PubMed
-
- Ling T. Evaluating complex and unfolding interventions in real time. Evaluation. 2012;18:79–91.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical