Combined fixed-functional treatment of skeletal class II malocclusions with the EVAA appliance: a preliminary study
- PMID: 24996856
- DOI: 10.1007/s00056-014-0218-8
Combined fixed-functional treatment of skeletal class II malocclusions with the EVAA appliance: a preliminary study
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the skeletal and dental effects of the EVAA appliance with those of an activator appliance in growing children with skeletal Class II anomalies.
Materials and methods: A total of 34 subjects with Class II anomalies were recruited for this study. They were divided into three groups: the EVAA group (n=13; mean chronological age: 11 years 9 months), activator group (n=13; mean chronological age: 11 years 8 months) and control group (n=8; mean chronological age: 10 years 8 months). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken at the beginning and end of functional therapy. Fixed orthodontic treatment was completed in the EVAA group. A statistical software program (SPSS 18) was used for one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons with the Duncan test.
Results: We observed a significant decrease in the ANB, convexity, and 1┴NA (°), while a significant increase appeared in upper anterior facial height, posterior facial height, 1┴NB (mm), SN-lower occlusal plane values in the EVAA and activator groups after treatment (p<0.05). No significant difference in study parameters in the control group during the treatment period except for the increase in SNA and 1┴NA (mm) values (p<0.05) were observed. There were no significant differences between EVAA and activator treatment groups in terms of study parameters except for the articular angle, which was significantly higher in the EVAA group after therapy (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The effects of EVAA appliances were similar to those of activator treatment.
Similar articles
-
Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.Eur J Orthod. 2007 Apr;29(2):140-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm003. Eur J Orthod. 2007. PMID: 17488997 Clinical Trial.
-
Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Nov;150(5):818-830. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.020. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27871709
-
Fixed lingual mandibular growth modificator: a new appliance for class II correction.Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Jul-Aug;18(4):70-81. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000400011. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013. PMID: 24262419
-
Effects of orthodontic treatment with activator appliance on patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;10(12):12319-12334. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-3205. Ann Palliat Med. 2021. PMID: 35016488
-
Precision wings treating skeletal class II in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prog Orthod. 2025 May 26;26(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40510-025-00564-4. Prog Orthod. 2025. PMID: 40415149 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Coefficient of efficiency and effectiveness of functional appliances in class II malocclusion treatment : A systematic review.J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s00056-025-00585-y. Online ahead of print. J Orofac Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40208272 Review. English.
-
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 13;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29534303 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials