Clinical questions raised by providers in the care of older adults: a prospective observational study
- PMID: 24996915
- PMCID: PMC4091273
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005315
Clinical questions raised by providers in the care of older adults: a prospective observational study
Abstract
Objective: To characterise clinical questions raised by providers in the care of complex older adults in order to guide the design of interventions that can help providers answer these questions.
Materials and methods: To elicit clinical questions, we observed and audio recorded outpatient visits at three healthcare organisations. At the end of each appointment, providers were asked to identify clinical questions raised in the visit. Providers rated their questions based on their urgency, importance to the patient's care and difficulty in finding a useful answer to. Transcripts of the audio recordings were analysed to identify ageing-specific factors that may have contributed to the nature of the questions.
Results: We observed 36 patient visits with 10 providers at the three study sites. Providers raised 70 clinical questions (median of 2 clinical questions per patient seen; range 0-12), pursued 50 (71%) and successfully answered 34 (68%) of the questions they pursued. Overall, 36 (51%) of providers' questions were not answered. Over one-third of the questions were about treatment alternatives and adverse effects. All but two clinical questions were motivated either directly or indirectly by issues related to ageing, such as the normal physiological changes of ageing and diseases with higher prevalence in the elderly.
Conclusions: The frequency of clinical questions was higher than in previous studies conducted in general primary care patient populations. Clinical questions were predominantly influenced by ageing-related issues. We propose a series of recommendations that may be used to guide the design of solutions to help providers answer their clinical questions in the care of older adults.
Keywords: Decision-making; complex patient; delivery of health care; frail elderly.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Similar articles
-
What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making.Contraception. 2014 Sep;90(3):280-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 30. Contraception. 2014. PMID: 24863169
-
Quality care provision for older people: an interview study with patients and primary healthcare professionals.Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Aug;65(637):e500-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X686065. Br J Gen Pract. 2015. PMID: 26212845 Free PMC article.
-
Variations in factors associated with healthcare providers' intention to engage in interprofessional shared decision making in home care: results of two cross-sectional surveys.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5064-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32164669 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Healthcare providers' experiences in supporting community-living older adults to manage multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study.BMC Geriatr. 2019 Nov 19;19(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1345-2. BMC Geriatr. 2019. PMID: 31744477 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences of HIV-infected adults and healthcare providers with healthcare delivery practices that influence engagement in US primary healthcare settings: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Jun;17(6):1154-1228. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003756. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019. PMID: 30994499
Cited by
-
Clinical Questions Asked by Long-Term Care Providers Through eConsult: A Retrospective Study.Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 Aug 28;7:23337214211032055. doi: 10.1177/23337214211032055. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021. PMID: 34471649 Free PMC article.
-
Prescriber-Initiated Engagement of Pharmacists for Information and Intervention in Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly.Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Feb 21;8(1):24. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8010024. Pharmacy (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32098064 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring patient information needs in type 2 diabetes: A cross sectional study of questions.PLoS One. 2018 Nov 16;13(11):e0203429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203429. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30444868 Free PMC article.
-
Norwegian drug information centres strongly promote person-centred and personalised medicine: a brief report on the achievements and strategy.EPMA J. 2019 Apr 30;10(2):109-114. doi: 10.1007/s13167-019-00167-0. eCollection 2019 Jun. EPMA J. 2019. PMID: 31258816 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med 1985;103:596–9 - PubMed
-
- Del Fiol G, Workman TE, Gorman PN. Clinical questions raised by clinicians at the point of care: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:710–18 - PubMed
-
- Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1995;274:35–43 - PubMed
-
- Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA 2005;294:716–24 - PubMed
-
- Colwill JM, Cultice JM, Kruse RL. Will generalist physician supply meet demands of an increasing and aging population? Health Aff 2008;27:w232–41 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources