Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul 4:14:685.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-685.

Happy@Work: protocol for a web-based randomized controlled trial to improve mental well-being among an Asian working population

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Happy@Work: protocol for a web-based randomized controlled trial to improve mental well-being among an Asian working population

Qi Yuan et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Mental health issues pose a serious concern in the workplace for the huge productivity loss and financial burden associated with it. Unlike the traditional 'fixing-what-is-wrong' approach, positive psychology offers a less-stigmatized way to promote mental health. Psychological capital, a concept originated from positive psychology, has been proven effective in improving mental well-being and work performance. However, little evidence exists for its implementation among Asian working population or its cost-benefit for organizations adopting such promotion strategy. The current study is designed to assess the protective effects of a web-based psychology capital intervention among Hong Kong working population on individuals' mental health and work performance, as well as organizations' return-on-investment.

Methods/design: A two-arm randomized controlled trial design will be adopted. Eligible working adults will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group or the waiting-list control group, with 177 participants in each arm. The intervention, which consists of four web-based training sessions, each targeting one of the psychological capital components (hope, efficacy, optimism and resilience), will be implemented over a 4-week period. On-line surveys will assess the participants in each group at baseline, intervention completion, 1 and 3 months after the completion. The primary outcome is individuals' psychological capital level; secondary outcomes include individuals' well-being, depressive symptoms, work engagement and productivity. Return-on-investment will be calculated from the employers' perspective based on productivity gain, savings in medical expenditure, as well as operation and time costs. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle.

Discussion: This is the first experimental study that explores the applicability of psychological capital development among Asian population. Through investigating changes in individuals' work productivity from absenteeism and presenteeism, this will be one of the few studies that quantify productivity gains from any type of mental health promotion. By demonstrating effectiveness in improving mental well-being and a positive return-on-investment rate, the study may help convince more uptake of similar positive psychology interventions at workplace in Asia and elsewhere.

Trail registration: Number (assigned by Centre for Clinical Trials, Clinical Trials Registry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong): CUHK_CCT00396. Registration Date: 2014/02/13.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
After the screening, eligible participants will continue the registration process, followed by the baseline assessment. The automatic randomization afterwards will then randomly allocate them into the intervention and the waiting-list control group. The intervention group participants will receive the Happy@Work trainings; while the control group will be on the waiting-list for 4 months. Both groups need to finish post-intervention, 1-month and 3-month follow-up surveys.

References

    1. Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, Charlson FJ, Norman RE, Flaxman AD, Johns N. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382(9904):1575–1586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61611-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ, Sederer LI, Mark TL. The business case for quality mental health services: why employers should care about the mental health and well-being of their employees. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44(4):320–330. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200204000-00012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palmer S, Dryden W. Stress management: Approaches and interventions. Br J Guid Couns. 1994;22(1):5–12. doi: 10.1080/03069889408253661. - DOI
    1. Kessler R, Akiskal H, Ames M, Birnbaum H, Greenberg P, Jin R, Merikangas K, Simon G, Wang P. Prevalence and effects of mood disorders on work performance in a nationally representative sample of US workers. Am J Psychiatr. 2006;163(9):1561–1568. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.9.1561. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stephens T, Joubert N. The economic burden of mental health problems in Canada. Chronic Dis Can. 2001;22(1):18–23. - PubMed

Publication types