Target modality affects visually guided online control of reaching
- PMID: 24997229
- DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.06.010
Target modality affects visually guided online control of reaching
Abstract
The integration of vision and proprioception for estimating the hand's starting location prior to a reach has been shown to depend on the modality of the target towards which the reach is planned. Here we investigated whether the processing of online feedback is also influenced by target modality. Participants made reaching movements to a target that was defined by vision, proprioception, or both, and visual feedback about the unfolding movement was either present or absent. To measure online control we used the variability across trials; we examined the course of this variability for the different target modalities and effector conditions. Our results showed that the rate of decrease in variability in the later part of the movements (an indicator of online control) was minimally influenced by effector vision when participants reached towards a proprioceptive target, whereas the rate of decrease was clearly influenced by effector vision when participants reached towards a visual target. In other words, when participants reached towards a proprioceptively defined target they relied less on visual information about the moving hand than when they reached towards a visually defined target. These results suggest that target modality influences visual processing for online control.
Keywords: Action; Online control; Proprioception; Reaching; Vision.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
When adaptive control fails: Slow recovery of reduced rapid online control during reaching under reversed vision.Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):155-65. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Vision Res. 2015. PMID: 25218421
-
A key region in the human parietal cortex for processing proprioceptive hand feedback during reaching movements.Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:615-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.024. Epub 2013 Sep 20. Neuroimage. 2014. PMID: 24060316
-
Is proprioception calibrated during visually guided movements?Exp Brain Res. 2005 Nov;167(2):292-6. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0063-5. Epub 2005 Nov 15. Exp Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 16044301
-
The influence of visual target information on the online control of movements.Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):144-54. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 16. Vision Res. 2015. PMID: 25038472 Review.
-
Visually-guided correction of hand reaching movements: The neurophysiological bases in the cerebral cortex.Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):244-56. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 28. Vision Res. 2015. PMID: 25264945 Review.
Cited by
-
Multisensory Integration in Stroke Patients: A Theoretical Approach to Reinterpret Upper-Limb Proprioceptive Deficits and Visual Compensation.Front Neurosci. 2021 Apr 7;15:646698. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.646698. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33897359 Free PMC article.
-
Using proprioception to control ongoing actions: dominance of vision or altered proprioceptive weighing?Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jul;236(7):1897-1910. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5258-7. Epub 2018 Apr 25. Exp Brain Res. 2018. PMID: 29696313
-
Grasping movements toward seen and handheld objects.Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 6;9(1):3665. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38277-w. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 30842478 Free PMC article.
-
Visual and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of precision manual motor control in autism spectrum disorder.J Neurodev Disord. 2021 Sep 8;13(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s11689-021-09381-2. J Neurodev Disord. 2021. PMID: 34496766 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources