Short communication: evaluation of an automated in-house hematology analyzer for bovine blood
- PMID: 24997670
- DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7736
Short communication: evaluation of an automated in-house hematology analyzer for bovine blood
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the V-Sight hematology analyzer (A. Menarini Pharma GmbH, Vienna, Austria) for bovine blood by a comparison with a reference device (Advia 2120i, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany). In total, 97 blood samples were obtained from 75 dairy cows. Analyzed parameters included counts of white blood cells (WBC), lymphocytes, monocytes, granulocytes, red blood cells (RBC), and platelets (PLT), as well as hemoglobin concentration (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), MCH concentration (MCHC), mean platelet volume (MPV), and plateletcrit (PCT). Based on Passing-Bablok regression, the V-Sight provided accurate and precise results for MCH and MCHC only. The PCT results were comparable to the reference method, but precision was inconclusive. Significant proportional differences were detected for monocytes, granulocytes, HCT, and PLT. For all other analytes, significant proportional and systemic differences were observed. The WBC and lymphocyte results from the V-Sight were characterized by poor accuracy, poor precision, and a high number of false positive outliers. Bland-Altman analysis indicated negative biases for all WBC parameters, the erythrocyte indices, and PLT. Positive biases were observed for RBC, HGB, HCT, MPV, and PCT. Correlation coefficients of >0.9 between the V-Sight and the reference method were found only for RBC, HGB, HCT, and MPV. Intraassay precision of the V-Sight analyzer was acceptable (coefficient of variation <5%) for granulocytes, the erythrocyte indices, and MPV. It was unacceptable (coefficient of variation ≥5%) for WBC, lymphocytes, monocytes, as well as RBC, and inconclusive for HGB, HCT, PLT, and PCT. Sensitivity was high for all RBC counts and indices as well as PLT, but low for monocytes, granulocytes, and MPV. Specificity was high for monocytes and granulocytes, but low for RBC, HCT, MCH, and MCHC. With accurate and precise results for only 2 out of 13 parameters, the V-Sight cannot be recommended for analysis of bovine blood.
Keywords: blood; cattle; hematology analyzer; method validation.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of automated erythrocyte methodology in new world camelids using the ADVIA 2120 hematology analyzer.Vet Clin Pathol. 2019 Jun;48(2):239-249. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12733. Epub 2019 Jun 9. Vet Clin Pathol. 2019. PMID: 31179576
-
Validation of the Celltac alpha automated hematology analyzer for canine and feline blood samples.Vet Clin Pathol. 2013 Mar;42(1):11-8. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12019. Epub 2012 Dec 31. Vet Clin Pathol. 2013. PMID: 23278503
-
Performance evaluation of new Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer.Int J Lab Hematol. 2019 Oct;41(5):657-663. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13082. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Int J Lab Hematol. 2019. PMID: 31271528
-
[Automated hematology analysers and spurious counts Part 2. Leukocyte count and differential].Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2012 Mar-Apr;70(2):141-54. doi: 10.1684/abc.2012.0665. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2012. PMID: 22484525 Review. French.
-
Evaluation of canine and feline leukocyte differential counts obtained with the scil vCell 5 compared to the Advia 2120 hematology analyzer and a manual method.J Vet Diagn Invest. 2023 Nov;35(6):679-697. doi: 10.1177/10406387231187899. Epub 2023 Aug 23. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2023. PMID: 37612877 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Performance evaluation of Rayto RT-7600Vet hematology analyzer in side-by-side comparison with manual hematological methods for apparently healthy Cholistani cattle blood.PLoS One. 2025 Mar 11;20(3):e0302617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302617. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40067785 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources