Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;100(5):495-502.
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

Effect of scapular pillar anatomy on scapular impingement in adduction and rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Affiliations
Free article

Effect of scapular pillar anatomy on scapular impingement in adduction and rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

J Berhouet et al. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Notching of the scapular pillar is the main radiographic complication seen during follow-up of reverse shoulder arthroplasties. Several recommendations pertaining to the implantation technique and glenoid component design have been suggested. No studies have investigated potential anatomic risk factors for inferior scapular impingement.

Hypothesis: A specific anatomic shape of the scapular pillar promotes the development of notching.

Materials and methods: The Aequalis Reversed(®) (Tornier Inc., Edina, MN, USA) prosthesis was implanted into 40 cadaver scapulae. We measured maximal range-of-motion (ROM) in internal rotation, external rotation, and adduction. The anatomic specimens were then imaged using two-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and the scapular neck angle, surface area under the scapular pillar, and distance from the central glenosphere peg to the inferior glenoid rim were measured. Associations between these CT parameters and ROM values were assessed using statistical independence tests.

Results: ROM values were greatest when the surface area under the scapular pillar was above 0.8 cm(2) (P<0.5). This feature combined with a scapular neck angle less than 105° produced the largest ROM values (P<0.5).

Discussion: The scapular neck angle alone is not sufficient to identify a scapular morphology that increases the risk of notching. The surface area under the scapular pillar, in contrast, discriminates between scapulae with and without a high risk of notching. The surface area under the scapular pillar is influenced by the inferior glenoid offset.

Conclusion: We were unable to define a specific scapular shape at high risk for notching. The prevention of notching should rely chiefly on a rigorous glenoid component implantation technique, with particular attention to the inferior offset.

Level of evidence: III, experimental study.

Keywords: Glenosphere offset; Notching; Scapular pillar; Shoulder; Total reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources