Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Jun;47(6):993-5.
doi: 10.1097/00007890-198906000-00015.

Low rate of Rhesus immunization from Rh-incompatible blood transfusions during liver and heart transplant surgery

Affiliations

Low rate of Rhesus immunization from Rh-incompatible blood transfusions during liver and heart transplant surgery

G Ramsey et al. Transplantation. 1989 Jun.

Abstract

Transfusion of one unit or more of Rh-positive red blood cells normally causes circulating anti-D antibody to appear 2-6 months later in 80-95% of Rh- persons. We asked whether transplant immunosuppression with cyclosporine and corticosteroids affects Rh immunization. Nineteen Rh- liver, heart, and heart-lung transplant recipients received 3-153 (median: 10) units of Rh+ RBCs at surgery and were tested for anti-D greater than 2 months later. Three patients developed anti-D at 11-15 days; one may have had an unusually rapid primary immune response and two were secondary to previous exposure by pregnancy. None of the other 16 patients had anti-D when tested 2.5-51 months later (13 patients, greater than 11.5 months). This low rate of Rhesus immunization in association with cyclosporine immunosuppression allows greater flexibility in meeting the transfusion needs of Rh- liver and heart transplant patients. Caution is still advised in young females and in patients who may have been previously exposed to Rh+ RBCs by transfusion or by pregnancy prior to the availability of perinatal Rh immune globulin twenty years ago. Other humoral immune responses to some vaccines or infectious agents may also be impaired in transplant patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mollison PL, Engelfriet CP, Contreras M. Blood transfusion in clinical medicine. Oxford: Blackwell; 1987. p. 328.
    1. Pollack W, Ascari WQ, Crispen JF, O’Connor RR, Ho TY. Studies on Rh prophylaxis: II. Rh immune prophylaxis after transfusion with Rh-positive blood. Transfusion. 1971;11:340. - PubMed
    1. Cook K, Rush B. Rh(D) immunization after massive transfusion, of Rh(D)-positive blood. Med J Aust. 1974;1:166. - PubMed
    1. Urbaniak SJ, Robertson AE. A successful program of immunizing Rh-negative male volunteers for anti-D production using frozen/thawed blood. Transfusion. 1981;21:64. - PubMed
    1. Lewis JH, Bontempo FA, Cornell F, et al. Blood use in liver transplantation. Transfusion. 1987;27:222. - PMC - PubMed