Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Jul 7;9(7):e101920.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101920. eCollection 2014.

Potential role for HIV-specific CD38-/HLA-DR+ CD8+ T cells in viral suppression and cytotoxicity in HIV controllers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Potential role for HIV-specific CD38-/HLA-DR+ CD8+ T cells in viral suppression and cytotoxicity in HIV controllers

Stéphane Hua et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: HIV controllers (HIC) are rare HIV-1-infected patients who exhibit spontaneous viral control. HIC have high frequency of CD38-/HLA-DR+ HIV-specific CD8+ T cells. Here we examined the role of this subset in HIC status.

Materials and methods: We compared CD38-/HLA-DR+ CD8+ T cells with the classical CD38+/HLA-DR+ activated phenotype in terms of 1) their activation status, reflected by CD69, CD25, CD71, CD40 and Ki67 expression, 2) functional parameters: Bcl-2 expression, proliferative capacity, and IFN-γ and IL-2 production, and 3) cytotoxic activity. We also investigated how this particular profile is generated.

Results: Compared to CD38+/HLA-DR+ cells, CD38-/HLA-DR+ cells exhibited lower expression of several activation markers, better survival capacity (Bcl-2 MFI, 367 [134-462] vs 638 [307-747], P = 0.001), higher frequency of polyfunctional cells (15% [7%-33%] vs 21% [16%-43%], P = 0.0003), greater proliferative capacity (0-fold [0-2] vs 3-fold [2]-[11], P = 0.007), and higher cytotoxicity in vitro (7% [3%-11%] vs 13% [6%-22%], P = 0.02). The CD38-/HLA-DR+ profile was preferentially generated in response to low viral antigen concentrations.

Conclusions: These data highlight the role of CD38-/HLA-DR+ HIV-specific CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity in HIC status and provide insights into the mechanism by which they are generated. Induction of this protective CD8+ subset may be important for vaccine strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. CD38 and HLA-DR expression on bulk and HIV-specific CD8+ T cells.
(A) Proportions of bulk CD8+ T cells from HD (n = 16, light gray bars), HAART-treated patients (n = 19, mid gray bars), viremic patients (n = 21, dark gray bars) and HIC (n = 79, black bars) expressing CD38 and HLA-DR. (C) Proportions of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells from HAART-treated patients (n = 13, mid gray bars), viremic patients (n = 39, dark gray bars) and HIC (n = 80, black bars) expressing CD38 and HLA-DR. Pie charts representing CD38/HLA-DR (white), CD38/HLA-DR+ (black), CD38+/HLA-DR (light gray) and CD38+/HLA-DR+ (dark gray) cells among bulk (B) and HIV-specific CD8+ T cells (D). Statistical differences shown in the pie charts are based on the difference in the frequency of the CD38/HLA-DR+ subset between the different groups. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Activation phenotype of CD38/HLA-DR, CD38/HLA-DR+ and CD38+/HLA-DR+ subsets from HIC.
(A) Proportions of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells expressing CD38, HLA-DR, CD69, CD25, CD71, CD40 and Ki67. (B–F) Proportions of CD38/HLA-DR, CD38/HLA-DR+ and CD38+/HLA-DR+ HIV-specific CD8+ T cells expressing CD69 (B), CD25 (C), CD71 (D), CD40 (E) and Ki67 (F) (n = 8). * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Qualitative features of CD38/HLA-DR+ and CD38+/HLA-DR+ HIV-specific CD8+ T cell subsets in HIC.
(A) Bcl-2 expression on CD38/HLA-DR+ and CD38+/HLA-DR+ HIV-specific CD8+ T cells (n = 11). (B) Proportion of CD38/HLA-DR+ and CD38+/HLA-DR+ HIV-specific CD8+ T cells producing both IFN-γ and IL-2 among HIV-specific CD8+ T cells producing IFN-γ or IL-2 (n = 35). (C) Fold increase in CD38/HLA-DR+ and CD38+/HLA-DR+ HIV-specific CD8+ T cell numbers after 5 days of culture with HIV peptides (2 µM) (n = 7). (D–E) Proportion of CD38/HLA-DR+ and CD38+/HLA-DR+ HIV-specific CD8+ T cells producing perforin (D) and granzyme B (E) (n = 35). (F) Graphs representing percentage cytotoxicity (measured as granzyme-B-mediated intracellular cleavage of a fluorogenic substrate) of CD38/HLA-DR+ and CD38+/HLA-DR+ HIV-specific CD8+ T cells (n = 11). * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Influence of stimulatory conditions on the activation phenotype of specific CD8+ T cells.
(A) Representative dot plots of HLA-DR and CD38 expression in unstimulated conditions (upper graph), after IFN-α stimulation (middle graph) or peptide stimulation (2 µM, lower graph) among specific (dark dots) and non-specific (gray dots) CD8+ T cells from healthy donors after a four-day culture period. CD38 and HLA-DR expression on bulk (C left panel) and specific CD8+ T cells (B and C right panel). (B) Flow cytometry histograms showing representative results for cells from one individual in unstimulated conditions (dark lines), after IFN-α stimulation (light gray histograms) or peptide stimulation (dark gray histograms). (C) Surface expression of CD38 (white bars) and HLA-DR (gray bars) on bulk and specific CD8+ T cells (n = 4).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Stimulation with a low antigen concentration induces the CD38/HLA-DR+ phenotype on specific CD8+ T cells.
(A) Graphs representing the frequency of (A) CD38/HLA-DR+ cells (dark histograms) and (B) CD38+/HLA-DR+ cells (dark gray histograms) among activated EBV-specific healthy donor CD8+ T cells (i.e. those expressing CD38 and/or HLA-DR) after a four-day culture period (n = 8).
Figure 6
Figure 6. High antigen sensitivity is associated with a high frequency of CD38/HLA-DR+ cells in HIC.
The antigen sensitivity of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells was measured in ELISpot assays with serial limiting dilutions of antigenic peptides (from 10−5 to 10−11 M) and was expressed as the log molar concentration of peptide yielding 50% of the maximum response (EC50%). Correlations between the proportion of CD38/HLA-DR+ (A) or CD38+/HLA-DR+ (B) and the antigen sensitivity of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells from HIC. Correlations were evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The Spearman r correlation and the Pearson correlation curve are indicated for significant correlations (n = 47).

References

    1. Deeks SG, Walker BD (2007) Human immunodeficiency virus controllers: mechanisms of durable virus control in the absence of antiretroviral therapy. Immunity 27: 406–416 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.08.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lambotte O, Boufassa F, Madec Y, Nguyen A, Goujard C, et al. (2005) HIV Controllers: A Homogeneous Group of HIV-1—Infected Patients with Spontaneous Control of Viral Replication. Clin Infect Dis 41: 1053–1056 10.1086/433188 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sáez-Cirión A, Pancino G (2013) HIV controllers: a genetically determined or inducible phenotype? Immunol Rev 254: 281–294 10.1111/imr.12076 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carrington M, O'Brien SJ (2003) The influence of HLA genotype on AIDS. Annu Rev Med 54: 535–551 10.1146/annurev.med.54.101601.152346 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carrington M, Walker BD (2012) Immunogenetics of spontaneous control of HIV. Annu Rev Med 63: 131–145 10.1146/annurev-med-062909-130018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types