Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 7:14:490.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-490.

Establishment of using serum YKL-40 and SCCA in combination for the diagnosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations

Establishment of using serum YKL-40 and SCCA in combination for the diagnosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Xin Zheng et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Elevated serum YKL-40 levels have been observed in various cancers. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of serum YKL-40 alone or in combination with the CEA, CYFRA21-1 and SCCA tumor markers for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods: YKL-40 was detected in ESCC cell lines and tissues by real-time RT-PCR, Western blotting and ELISA. YKL-40 protein expression was determined in 20 ESCC tumor tissues using immunohistochemistry. Serum YKL-40 was measured by ELISA in 126 healthy donors, 59 patients with benign esophageal diseases and 150 patients with ESCC. Serum CEA, CYFRA21-1 and SCCA were determined by electrochemiluminescence.

Results: YKL-40 mRNA and protein were observed in ESCC cancer cell lines, tissues and cell culture media, respectively. YKL-40 expression was observed in 17 of 20 ESCC samples (85%). Serum YKL-40 concentration was significantly elevated in patients with ESCC (Range: 6.95-502.10 ng/ml) compared with patients with benign diseases (Range: 1.21-429.30 ng/ml; P = 0.038) and healthy controls (Range: 2.56-132.26 ng/ml; P < 0.001). ROC curves demonstrated that serum YKL-40 has a sensitivity of 72.70%, a specificity of 84.13% and an AUC of 0.874 for the diagnosis of ESCC, which was superior to CEA (Sen: 8.00%; Spe: 96.80%, AUC = 0.652), CYFRA21-1 (Sen: 40.00%; Spe: 92.06%, AUC = 0.746) and SCCA (Sen: 32.67%; Spe: 94.44%, AUC = 0.789). The YKL-40 and SCCA combination was better for diagnosing ESCC (Sen: 82.00%, Spe: 79.37%, PPV: 82.55 and NPV: 78.74; AUC = 0.917) than the YKL-40 and CEA combination (Sen: 74.00%, Spe: 83.20%, PPV: 84.09 and NPV: 72.73; AUC = 0.877), the YKL-40 and CYFRA21-1 combination (Sen: 82.00%, Spe: 77.78%, PPV: 81.46% and NPV: 78.40%; AUC = 0.897) or the CEA, CYFRA21-1 and SCCA combination (Sen: 56.67%, Spe: 84.80%, PPV: 81.73 and NPV: 61.99; AUC = 0.831). Associations between serum YKL-40 levels and the clinic characteristics of ESCC were not significant, with the exception of age (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: ESCC tumor cells and tissues express YKL-40. Serum YKL-40 may be a potential biomarker for ESCC. Serum YKL-40 in combination with SCCA significantly increases the sensitivity of detecting ESCC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expression of YKL-40 mRNA or protein in ESCC cell lines, tissues and location in tissue. Expression of mRNA and protein in immortalized esophageal epithelial cell line (NE-3) and esophageal carcinoma cell lines was analyzed by real-time PCR and Western Blotting, respectively (A, B) and in six pairs of matched ESCC and noncancerous tissues (D, E). Expression level was normalized by GAPDH and α-tublin, respectively. Error bars represent standard deviations (SD) calculated from three parallel experiments. Protein level in supernatant was measured by ELISA (C). Location of YKL-40 was determined by immunohistochemistry (F). The normal esophageal epithelial tissue showed no expression of YKL-40 (F a-b, 200 × and 400×). The ESCC tissues showed low (F c-d), medium (F e-f) and high (F g-h) expression of YKL-40 (200× and 400×).
Figure 2
Figure 2
YKL-40 concentration in serum in the test cohort. Left side, the serum YKL-40 in ESCC patients, benign disease patients, healthy controls and early-stage ESCC patients are plotted as a distribution. P value was calculated using Kruskal-Wallis test. Right side, YKL-40 serum levels in different groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnostic outcomes for serum YKL-40, CEA, CYFRA21-1 or SCCA in the diagnosis of ESCC. A. ROC curves of the serum YKL-40 levels of 150 ESCC patients and 126 controls. The estimated area under the ROC curve was observed as AUC = 0.874. B. ROC curves for the diagnostic strength to identify ESCC using YKL-40, CEA, CYFRA21-1 or SCCA (CEA: AUC = 0.652; CYFRA21-1 = 0.746; SCCA = 0.789).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diagnostic outcomes for serum YKL-40, CEA, CYFRA21-1 or SCCA combination in the diagnosis of ESCC. A. ROC curves for the diagnostic strength to identify ESCC using CEA and YKL-40+CEA (CEA: AUC=0.652; YKL-40+CEA: AUC=0.877). B. ROC curves for the diagnostic strength to identify ESCC using CYFRA21-1 and YKL-40+CYFRA21-1 (CYFRA21-1: AUC=0.746; YKL-40+CYFRA21-1: AUC=0.897). C. ROC curves for the diagnostic strength to identify ESCC using SCCA and YKL-40+SCCA (SCCA: AUC=0.789; YKL-40+SCCA: AUC=0.917). D. ROC curves for the diagnostic strength to identify ESCC using YKL-40+CEA, YKL-40+CYFRA21-1, YKL-40+SCCA and CEA+CYFRA21-1+SCCA (YKL-40+CEA: AUC=0.877; YKL-40+CYFRA21-1: AUC=0.897; YKL-40+SCCA: AUC=0.917; CEA+CYFRA21-1+SCCA: AUC=0.831).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2241–2252. - PubMed
    1. Urba SG, Orringer MB, Turrisi A, Iannettoni M, Forastiere A, Strawderman M. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:305–313. - PubMed
    1. Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group. Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1727–1733. - PubMed
    1. Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche O, Milan C, Mariette C, Conroy T, Pezet D, Roullet B, Seitz JF, Herr JP, Paillot B, Arveux P, Bonnetain F, Binquet C. Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1160–1168. - PubMed
    1. Hu Y, Zheng B, Rong TH, Fu JH, Zhu ZH, Yang H, Luo KJ, Li YF. Prognostic analysis of the patients with stage-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy. Chin J Cancer. 2010;29:178–183. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms