Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Jul 8:4:5297.
doi: 10.1038/srep05297.

Comparison of five different RNA sources to examine the lactating bovine mammary gland transcriptome using RNA-Sequencing

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of five different RNA sources to examine the lactating bovine mammary gland transcriptome using RNA-Sequencing

Angela Cánovas et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine five different sources of RNA, namely mammary gland tissue (MGT), milk somatic cells (SC), laser microdissected mammary epithelial cells (LCMEC), milk fat globules (MFG) and antibody-captured milk mammary epithelial cells (mMEC) to analyze the bovine mammary gland transcriptome using RNA-Sequencing. Our results provide a comparison between different sampling methods (invasive and non-invasive) to define the transcriptome of mammary gland tissue and milk cells. This information will be of value to investigators in choosing the most appropriate sampling method for different research applications to study specific physiological states during lactation. One of the simplest procedures to study the transcriptome associated with milk appears to be the isolation of total RNA directly from SC or MFG released into milk during lactation. Our results indicate that the SC and MFG transcriptome are representative of MGT and LCMEC and can be used as effective and alternative samples to study mammary gland expression without the need to perform a tissue biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This project was partially funded by the France Berkeley Fund (http://fbf.berkeley.edu/), collaboration between JFM and PM and by Incentive credits from the Animal Genetics Department of INRA. Angela Cánovas received a contractual Postdoctoral grant from ME/Fulbright.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Total RNA capillary electrophoresis chromatograms from mammary and milk fractions.
(A) Mammary tissue (MGT), (B) Somatic cells (SC), (C) Laser capture mammary epithelial cells (LCMEC), (D) Antibody-captured milk mammary epithelial cells (mMEC), (E) Milk fat globule (MFG). Traces (A) and (C) (Agilent Bioanalyzer), traces (B), (D), (E) Experion Analyzer (BioRad). These diagrams show the differences in quality of RNA obtained from the different fractions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mammary gland tissue (MGT) before microdissection (A) and mammary epithelial cells after laser microdissection (LCMEC) (B1 and B2). Chromatograms from total RNA capillary electrophoresis; MGT before microdissection (A1) LCMEC after microdissection (B3).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bevilacqua C., Makhzami S., Helbling J. C., Defrenaix P. & Martin P. Maintaining RNA integrity in a homogeneous population of mammary epithelial cells isolated by Laser Capture Microdissection. BMC Cell Biol 11, 95 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Capuco A. V., Wood D. L., Baldwin R., McLeod K. & Paape M. J. Mammary cell number, proliferation, and apoptosis during a bovine lactation: relation to milk production and effect of bST. J Dairy Sci 84, 2177–2187 (2001). - PubMed
    1. Huston G. E. & Patton S. Factors related to the formation of cytoplasmic crescents on milk fat globules. J Dairy Sci 73, 2061–2066 (1990). - PubMed
    1. Boutinaud M. & Jammes H. Potential uses of milk epithelial cells: a review. Reprod Nutr Dev 42, 133–147 (2002). - PubMed
    1. Medrano J. F., Rincón G. & Islas A. D. Comparative analysis of bovine milk and mammary gland transcriptome using RNA-Seq. 9th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP), Leipzig-Germany, No. 0852 (2010).

Publication types